Red Hat has filed a complaint against SCO Group with the aim of showing that Red Hat technologies do not infringe on SCO's intellectual property and to hold SCO accountable for "unfair and deceptive actions".
Red Hat announced that it has filed a lawsuit against SCO in US District Court for the District of Delaware timed to coincide with the LinuxWorld conference in San Francisco.
It is seeking a declaratory judgment from the district court that would rule SCO's claims regarding copyright infringement are untrue.
Red Hat has also has established the Open Source Now Fund, that will cover legal expenses associated with infringement claims against companies and developers of open source software under the GNU General Public License license.
The legal defence fund covers open-source software generally and not just the Linux operating system, Red Hat said. Red Hat pledged $US1 million to the fund.
The court action is being taken to bring facts into the open and to stop "innuendo" spreading as a consequence of SCO filing a $US1 billion lawsuit against IBM in March, alleging that IBM breached a Unix licensing agreement and stole trade secrets.
SCO contends that IBM is illegally using Unix code in its Linux services business. It then announced it was dropping its Linux business and warned commercial Linux users that they could be liable for intellectual property violations, setting off fury in the open-source community.
"For the past two months, we have listened to innuendo and rumour and unfounded claims that have been launched against our customers, in face-to-face meetings with investment analysts (and) in face-to-face meetings with other industry analysts, regarding the unfounded claims associated with Linux and the Linux industry,"chairman and chief executive officer (CEO) of Red Hat, Matthew Szulik, , said.
"In a recent conference call, Red Hat was mentioned specifically by name and threats were launched on behalf of the SCO organisation against the entire Linux industry," he said. "We've been patient. We've listened. But when our customers, the whole open-source community (and) our investors are now threatened with these unfounded claims and innuendo and rumor, it's time to act."
Red Hat sought without success to work with SCO management to resolve the issue, he said, and brought the lawsuit to settle the matter quickly.
The seven-count complaint asks for a declaratory judgment that no Linux version sold, used or distributed by Red Hat, or used by Red Hat's customers, infringes SCO's intellectual property rights. It also seeks a declaratory judgment that Red Hat's use and sale of Linux and its use by the company's customers doesn't misappropriate SCO trade secrets.
Other counts allege false advertising in SCO's comments about Linux, deceptive trade practices that are causing "irreparable harm" to Red Hat, unfair competition, interference with prospective business opportunities, trade libel and disparagement of Red Hat's products, services and business practices.
Red Hat is seeking a permanent injunction restraining SCO from acting to cause confusion or make purchasers, business partners and investors believe Red Hat's products violate SCO's intellectual property rights or trade secrets. It also seeks actual damages from SCO's actions, in an amount to be established at trial, and three times those damages based on Delaware's Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
Though Red Hat hadn't been able to quantify the impact of SCO's statements, it had seen customers delay purchases, Szulik said.
Red Hat planned to seek contributions to the Open Source Now Fund from other Linux vendors, he said. The fund could be used for Red Hat's defense or the legal costs of any other Linux vendors or commercial developers that face suits over the issue.
The fund won't be available to customers, Szulik said. As a matter of policy, Red Hat doesn't indemnify its customers for legal challenges concerning its software, according to the company.
After his forceful statements at the hastily arranged news conference, Szulik acknowledged to reporters that he took SCO's challenges personally.
"For me as the CEO of the Linux leader not to take this personally, I would be lying to you if I told you I didn't," he said.
A response by SCO was not available at press time.