It was only because I was an hour late meeting Randi for lunch on Sunday that I realised the clocks had gone forward. She was waiting for me outside the restaurant where we had arranged to meet. When I arrived, she was digging in her purse for spare change to give to the ex-dot-com CEO who was begging on the corner.
I explained my mistake, and she, of course, took great pleasure in ragging me about it.
"Only you could be that disorganised," she said.
Going, going, gone
Luckily, however, I was later able to demonstrate that I am not the only one - eBay also messed up its handling of the time change. Whereas my mistake caused me mild embarrassment, eBay's was a little more serious: A software glitch meant that the company closed down its auctions an hour earlier than it should have, causing all those bidders who had planned to swoop in at the last minute to be shut out. Of course, the sellers were also aggrieved because they lost out financially.
Behind the times?
I'm also told that Microsoft's Windows NT suffered from a bug related to the time change. According to one reader, the OS failed to account for daylight-saving time when April 1 falls on a Sunday - as it did this year. Apparently, the server displayed the correct time, but the MSVCRT.DLL run-time library in C++ - used by certain applications to determine the time, including the reader's time-card system - was off by an hour.
The reader says that the glitch was discovered in 1999, giving Microsoft two whole years to sort it out, but apparently nothing was done.
I haven't been through them in detail,
but I have been copied on many e-mail messages in which readers have given their opinions on Microsoft's benchmarking policies. At first glance, the vast majority seem to agree that, although Microsoft should be able to prevent inaccurate information from being published, it should have no say in the way the benchmarks are run - any disagreement in the methodology or configuration used should be included in the review. This seems fair.
I need to point out a small error, however. The e-mail address to tell Microsoft what you think about its policy is firstname.lastname@example.org (Many of you realised that "www" is unlikely to belong in an e-mail address). Apologies for the mistake, and if you mailed Microsoft using the incorrect address, please resend it.
"For being so late, you can pay for lunch," Randi said. "But this place looks a bit downmarket to me; let's find somewhere more expensive."Got some antipodean gossip? Send it on to email@example.com