NOTES FROM THE FIELD: You can bank on this news

NOTES FROM THE FIELD: You can bank on this news

Amber said with a smile, "Let's go shopping". Like many hardworking, underappreciated techies, I'm not a rich man. But out of the blue I received a small inheritance from my recently deceased uncle, God bless him. The question is what to do next.

Bank woes

Of course, I should bank the cheque, but given the Bank of America's experience, I'll be careful. One of my spies reports the Bank of America was "brought to its knees" recently by the Code Red virus. Despite proclaiming the worm caused "no customer impact," the bank was forced to shut down all of its intranet routers for at least a day, leaving the entire bank without Internet service.

According to a confidential internal memo I obtained, "The most significant impact has been that some associates are unable to access the Internet and some internal Web applications, due to preventative measures."

Meanwhile, word is Code Red hit others including First Union and Bank One. Now I remember why granny stuffed money under her mattress.

Wells Fargo is also having interesting times. A reader told me he received an e-mail from Wells Fargo containing new online banking information for a woman he doesn't know.

Curiously, when he went to do a search on the "corporate offices Wells Fargo & company," he found a Microsoft case study advertising that Wells Fargo was moving its entire corporate infrastructure to Windows 2000. I'm sure we would all like to think that was an intentional marketing ploy.

Damn that worm

Meanwhile, Code Red also caused havoc with Qwest's DSL service. A Qwest customer told me he lost his DSL connection in late July and then again in early August; but the second time it happened without explanation as support lines were jammed.

As of August 7, my informant had been without service for five days. The last I heard he'd been waiting on the phone for 3.75 hours with an expected wait time of two hours.

Which spam is worse?

And as if that's not enough, the tales of woe extend to AT&T, which apparently can't control its spam identifier service.

A reader says it scans his incoming mail, adding "potential spam" to the subject line - for ease of identification, I presume.

Then if you notify AT&T that

a message is spam, the com-

pany sends you two e-mails acknowledging your submission. Furthermore, its e-mail address

for cancelling the automatic acknowledgement apparently

doesn't work.

"You know, it's my birthday soon," Amber teased. This is weird; I've never had anyone love me for my money.

Got any antipodean gossip?

Send it on to

Follow Us

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.


Brand Post

Show Comments