Unisys appeals RACV case

Unisys appeals RACV case

Unisys Australia has lodged an appeal with the Victorian Supreme Court after bearing the brunt of a multimillion-dollar law suit decided late last month.

The Victorian Supreme Court had found in favour of a former Unisys client, RACV, which claimed the IT service provider engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct during a tender for an imaging system implementation. RACV claimed the response times requested in its tender were not met - and was subsequently awarded over $4 million in damages.

Unisys has spent the past few weeks formulating its appeal. It has been lodged on the grounds that the Supreme Court's Justice Hansen was incorrect in deciding Unisys had engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, and misinterpreted Unisys' contractual obligations during the implementation.

Unisys also claimed that Justice Hansen made numerous findings based on evidence not presented in the courtroom. Scott Mortimer, subsidiary general counsel for Unisys Australia, said the company was unable to discuss the exact content of this evidence until it has been heard in the Court of Appeal. But he did say that Unisys claims the evidence was submitted before the trial, but was not read or relied upon by either of the parties during the trial.

Additionally, Unisys claims that the system it delivered could have worked with a further $40,000 investment in disk storage. "The nub of the decision was not about response times, but rather that Unisys would create an online system where all documents would be stored online," Mortimer said. "The expert witnesses from both parties agreed that 12 gigabyte [cache] would have been sufficient."

Mortimer said it was unclear from the contract as to whether RACV or Unisys was responsible for the $40,000 cost of the disk storage, but Unisys was never given the opportunity to offer the solution. "This kind of thing is normally added toward the end of the implementation," he said. "The contract was terminated while we were still adding functionality and running small-scale tests."

RACV public affairs spokeswoman Bronwyn Thwaites said RACV plans to respond vigorously to the appeal. "We are very disappointed that Unisys has decided to appeal," she said. "We believe the appropriate judgement was handed down."

Follow Us

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments