ACCC alleges provider sold mobile contracts in areas without network coverage

ACCC alleges provider sold mobile contracts in areas without network coverage

Action initiated in Federal Court, Darwin, and set for May

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is taking action against mobile services provider, EDirect Pty Ltd, for allegedly, via telemarketing, entering into mobile phone contracts with customers who provided addresses in areas in which EDirect couldn’t supply its services due to lack of mobile coverage.

By doing so, the ACCC alleged EDirect engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct and misrepresented the performance characteristics, uses or benefits of its mobile telecommunication services, namely that the services would work in areas where the service in fact could not work.

EDirect Pty Ltd also trades as VIPtel Mobile and according to VIPtel’s website has a Melbourne postal address.

The ACCC also alleged that EDirect accepted payment for its mobile telecommunication services from certain consumers, when it:

  • Was aware or should have been aware that it wouldn't be able to supply the services within a reasonable time, or alternatively,
  • intended to supply mobile services that were materially different to the services for which it accepted payment from those consumers, ie EDirect accepted payment from those consumers for mobile services accessible at consumers' nominated addresses, but intended to supply services that were not accessible at consumers' nominated addresses.

The ACCC has initiated legal proceedings in the Federal Court, Darwin. It is seeking: pecuniary penalties, injunctions, declarations, redress for affected consumers, and court costs.

The first directions hearing will be before Justice Reeves in the Federal Court, Darwin, on Tuesday, May 17.

Follow Us

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags mobile phonescourt casetelecommunciationsEDirectmobile solutionsVIPtel MobileAustralian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)telemarketing


Show Comments