Ellison to settle insider trading suit

Ellison to settle insider trading suit

Larry Ellison has tentatively agreed to make $100 million in charitable donations to settle an insider trading lawsuit.

Oracle Chief Executive Officer Larry Ellison has tentatively agreed to settle a four year-old insider trading lawsuit, according to one of the lawyers suing Ellison.

The settlement, which must first be approved by Oracle's board of directors, would end a derivative lawsuit brought against Ellison in March 2001. The lawsuit charges that Ellison engaged in insider trading by selling nearly US$900 million in Oracle stock in January 2001, just weeks before the company announced that it would not meet earning expectations for its third fiscal quarter of 2001.

Ellison sold his stock for an average of US$30.76 per share, before the stock plummeted to nearly half that value on news of the earnings miss, according to Joseph Tabacco, one of the lawyers who brought the suit to court. The day after the third-quarter results were announced, Oracle shares were trading at $16.98, he said.

A court hearing on the settlement has been scheduled for Sept. 26 before Judge John Schwartz in San Mateo County Superior Court in Redwood City, California, said Tabacco, a lawyer with Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo in San Francisco.

Ellison will make some big-time charity donations as part of the settlement, Tabacco said. "Mr. Ellison, as part of this settlement, will fund US$100 million from his assets in charitable contributions over a five-year period in the name of Oracle," he said.

This is not the first case that has been brought against Ellison over the US$900 million in trades. Last year a Delaware court found that Oracle's CEO and Jeffrey Henley, formerly Oracle's chief financial officer, were not guilty of insider trading in the matter. And a securities class action lawsuit over the trades is still pending in federal court, Tabacco said.

Unlike the securities class action lawsuit, which was brought against Ellison on behalf of the shareholders, the derivative suit was brought on behalf of Oracle itself, Tabacco said. Accordingly, the settlement must be of benefit to Oracle, he said.

Tabacco could not say why the settlement did not simply involve a payment to Oracle, but he said that the software company would benefit from the agreement. "The most tangible benefit is the fact that they are being credited with a US$100 million charitable deduction," he said.

Oracle declined to comment on this story.

Follow Us

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Show Comments