IPv6 fears seen unfounded

IPv6 fears seen unfounded

Early adopters of IPv6 say deployment of this upgrade to the Internet's main communications protocol is significantly easier than expected and costs less than anticipated.

These findings run counter to longstanding conventional wisdom from the Internet engineering community, which for years has warned ISPs and corporate network managers about the need to prepare for a time-consuming and expensive upgrade to IPv6.

The U.S. Department of Defense and several universities reported positive feedback about their IPv6 deployments at the U.S. IPv6 Summit 2003, held in December.

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has worked on IPv6 since 1992. While the transition to IPv6 has taken longer than advocates expected, that pace appears to have generated an unintended benefit: Now that users want to deploy IPv6, it's already bundled in the hardware and software they need to buy in the course of normal infrastructure upgrades.

"IPv6 is less complex than we thought, and it doesn't take as many resources as we thought,'' says Jim Bound, chairman of the North American IPv6 Task Force and an HP fellow. Bound has been involved in IPv6 development and transition issues for nearly a decade.

IPv6 promises easier administration, tighter security, greater mobility and an enhanced addressing scheme over IPv4, the Internet's current protocol. IPv6 uses a 128-bit addressing scheme and can support a virtually limitless number of uniquely identified systems on the Internet. In contrast, IPv4 supports only a few billion systems because it uses a 32-bit addressing scheme.

The North American IPv6 Task Force joined the military and university communities in building the largest-ever network based on IPv6. Dubbed Moonv6, this network connects more than 80 servers, switches and nodes in eight states. Moonv6 was completed in October and is running IPv6 and IPv4.

"We were all shocked'' at how simple it was to deploy Moonv6, Bound says. "It went way easier than we thought. But the trick is you have to plan, plan, plan.''

More significant for corporate network managers is the idea that IPv6 will require few additional costs beyond regular network upgrades. That's what NTT DoCoMo Inc. subsidiary Verio Inc. discovered as it developed the first commercial IPv6 service in the U.S., which it announced at the summit.

"There wasn't a lot of cost to deploy our IPv6 service,'' says Cody Christman, director of product engineering for Verio. "IPv6 has been on our road map since 1997. We've always kept it in mind when we were upgrading our switches and routers.''

Verio has priced its new IPv6 offerings at the same rates as its IPv4 services. The company now offers commercial IPv6 service at every location in the U.S. where it offers Internet access.

"It's kind of a myth that when people deploy IPv6 it's going to require an enormous capital expenditure,'' Christman says. "It definitely wasn't the case at Verio.''

The IETF finalized the main IPv6 specifications in 1998. However, IPv6 has taken the intervening years to gain momentum among network vendors and ISPs.

IPv6 deployment is easier and costs less than anticipated because the protocol now ships with many networking products. All the major router manufacturers -- including Cisco Systems Inc., Juniper Networks Inc., Foundry Networks Inc. and Extreme Networks Inc. -- support IPv6. Microsoft Corp. supports IPv6 in Windows XP, and IPv6 comes bundled with the most popular versions of Unix and Linux. Key public domain software packages such as the Mozilla Web browser, Apache Web server and Sendmail e-mail software also support IPv6.

"All the network infrastructure components are IPv6 enabled,'' Bound says. "What we're still missing are software applications. We need the major business applications such as Oracle, PeopleSoft and SAP to support IPv6.'' These applications are coming, as evidenced by Oracle executives unveiling their IPv6 road map at the IPv6 Summit.

Industry observers now expect corporations to upgrade to IPv6 gradually as individual departments need newer software and hardware. IPv6 and IPv4 will coexist for many years because most companies replace desktops, servers and network gear every few years.

"IPv6 deployment will be interesting because it will not happen overnight,'' says Ben Schultz, managing engineer at the University of New Hampshire's Interoperability Lab in Durham. "Instead, there are going to be small experimental pockets within companies. . . . There's always going to be some legacy router that's a pain to upgrade and you'll have to tunnel around it.''

Early adopters say that because IPv6 comes bundled with network hardware and software, deployment costs are low. Verio found its IPv6 deployment costs to be negligible because the protocol comes built in with the latest router software. Verio uses routers from Cisco and Juniper.

"It does have to be tested like any (Juniper or Cisco software) rollout," Christman says. "We also modified our provisioning and automated network monitoring tools. But the costs are not significant from an ISP standpoint.''

That's why Verio is not charging a premium for its IPv6 service. Corporate network managers can purchase an IPv6 fractional DS-3 line for the same cost as an IPv4 fractional DS-3, he says.

Easy to deploy

Early adopters of IPv6 also are finding that the protocol is easier to deploy than expected.

The high-speed Abilene network, which links 200 U.S. universities, has enabled IPv6 on half of its network connectors. About 40 universities use the new protocol.

"You have to have routers capable of doing IPv6,'' says Rick Summerhill, associate director of backbone network infrastructure for the Internet2 consortium, which operates Abilene. "All we did was take our backbone and add IPv6 to our 11 (Juniper) routers. . . . It was easy.''

Summerhill predicts most universities that use Abilene will upgrade to IPv6 within three years. He says the upgrade to IPv6 will not be that expensive because it will happen as part of a "natural evolution'' of university networks.

"Putting IPv6 on a network backbone is relatively simple. Even regional-type networks are relatively easy,'' Summerhill says. "Closer to the [network] edges, the routing infrastructures may not be IPv6-capable. That may be a little harder. So people will evolve to it over three or four years.''

The positive feedback from early adopters of IPv6 is good news for the Defense Department, which has committed to a complete migration to IPv6 by 2008. The Defense Department's CIO John Stenbit has mandated that all IT purchases after Oct. 1, 2003 be IPv6-capable.

The Defense Department supports Moonv6, which links the University of New Hampshire's Interoperability Laboratory with military sites in Arizona, California, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, South Carolina and Virginia. Twenty-six network vendors have tested their hardware and software for IPv6 compliance and interoperability on the Moonv6 backbone.

Maj. Roswell Dixon, who oversees IPv6 testing for the Joint Interoperability Test Command at Ft. Huachuca in Arizona, says about 90 percent of the interoperability testing on Moonv6 has been successful.

Some of the IETF's IPv6 specifications "left a little room for interpretation,'' Dixon says. "We need better defined (specifications) but these are little glitches that can be fixed. We see no showstoppers with IPv6.''

Dixon says the military is migrating to IPv6 because of the mobility and security benefits that it offers. "We need IPv6 for network-centric warfare,'' he says.

Follow Us

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.


Show Comments