Please wait while the page is being loaded Skip this advertisement >
Sunday | 7 September, 2008
ARN
Caube rebuts EFA on Aussie spam bill
Stephen Bell (IDGNet New Zealand) 10 October, 2003 12:00:30

A scrap has broken out between two Australian online watchdogs over the country's proposed anti-spam legislation.

Caube.au, Australia’s Coalition Against Unsolicited Bulk Email, has hit back at criticism of the federal anti-spam bill by Electronic Frontiers Australia.

“[Caube.au] has reviewed the criticisms of EFA, and found that [its criticism of the bill as not truly anti-spam] is entirely unjustified,” said founding director Josh Rowe, in an email to ARN's sister publication, Computerworld Online.

“In particular:

  • None of the three case scenarios offered by EFA as examples of situations in which non-spam would be banned [are] correct. In each case the conduct in question would be legal under the proposed law.

  • The EFA analysis fails to reflect the flexible approach taken in the bill, which is designed to ensure that even if there are unexpected consequences, those consequences can be eliminated swiftly.
“The EFA approach gives more weight to the fringes of the legislation than to the core provisions,” Rowe said. “Indeed not one of the criticisms relates to the core provisions.

“The feared outcomes pay insufficient regard to the background of the common law, including the law of consent, administrative law and the common law as it relates to search warrant powers, which render those feared outcomes not just unlikely, but unlawful,” he said.

“The criticisms of the policy-based exceptions [for government agencies, religious bodies and ‘factual’ emails] fail to acknowledge that the law is to be reviewed two years after the penalties come into effect. [That review] will include reconsideration of those policy exceptions and to recognise that most of the exempted groups have strong reasons not to spam,” said Rowe.

While there is room for improvement, the bill sets the right base standard -- opt-in. It provides a framework in which almost all of the concerns that EFA has with the fringe areas can be fine-tuned by executive regulation.

“It is wrong to claim that the bill is 'not anti-spam'. The bill does ban spam. Not all spam, but the largest categories of spam. Its impact on non-bulk commercial email is minimal and adequate measures have been included to deal with unforeseen consequences.

"Accordingly, Caube.au continues to support the Spam Bill 2003 in its present form.”

A fuller account of Caube.au’s position on EFA’s view of the bill is at: www.caube.org.au/efa-reply.htm.

Market Place

ARN Member Login

 
Panel Sessions
  • ARN Panel Sessions: Day 3

    The last of our panel sessions recorded live at CeBIT 2008. Today, the topic is storage. Data is growing at an enormous rate, so what does the future hold?

Play
ARN news Channel Watch
  • Brian's bloopers

    It takes a long time to produce an episode of Channel Watch. Maybe you'll understand why after watching this...

Play
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Zone

When an IT disaster occurs, how handy it would be to push a button and start again as if nothing had happened.
Discover and learn more about CA XOSoft today.
ARN Vendor Directory
ARN Library

Download the Freeform research report on high availability and disaster recovery and sell more effectively in this space

A new research report from Freeform Dynamics, 'Risk and Resilience' reveals customer pain points as a result of application downtime. The reality is that today's global businesses cannot tolerate downtime for essential applications yet many do not have an effective solution in place. This creates an opportunity for high availability and disaster recovery solutions. To understand more about this opportunity download your free copy today.

Sponsored Links