Please wait while the page is being loaded Skip this advertisement >
Monday | 8 September, 2008
ARN
Fibre Channel's savior may have its own problems
Connecting the majority of servers to through FCoE without a plan to manage generates problems
Jerome Wendt (Computerworld) 15 April, 2008 11:55:41

Additional Resources
ARN Library

Newsletter Subscription

Sign up for our ARN newsletters!
The premier provider of daily news to the IT channel, covering business, technology, products, and services.
The latest news, features and tutorials on data storage with a reseller perspective.
RSS Feeds

Last week, while attending the Spring Storage Networking World in Orlando the big news was, believe it or not, storage networking. In this case, multiple vendors are touting Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) as storage networking's future.

In talking to users and vendors alike, the general consensus is that about 15 per cent of existing enterprise servers are attached to Fibre Channel SANs. These servers generally generate the most read/write traffic, are the fastest growing from a capacity perspective or a combination of both. However the majority of enterprise servers are not attached to any kind of Fibre Channel SAN simply because the costs still exceed whatever benefits that Fibre Channel provides.

FCoE theoretically changes that. FCoE's premise is that it provides enterprise data centers an economical method to connect their remote, standalone servers to their existing Fibre Channel infrastructure. The theory goes that because enterprise storage systems are already Fibre Channel attached and by using FCoE and new products like Cisco's Nexus 5000, companies can access and manage their existing storage system resources.

Now generally I am great believer in EoE (Everything over Ethernet) but FCoE has all of the makings of a really bad idea. Companies are already struggling to manage their existing storage infrastructure simply because storage management and virtualization tools have not kept pace with the complexities that their Fibre Channel existing infrastructure creates.

Bringing the remaining 85 per cent of corporate servers into the corporate Fibre Channel SAN infrastructure without a corresponding plan to virtualize and manage the storage and network traffic is fraught with problems. Toss in the fact that companies need a new type of network card and 10Gbit/sec. cabling, and that normally competing vendors are suddenly aligned, and the question becomes: Who benefits the most from your companies' adoption of FCoE, vendors or you?

Jerome Wendt is the president and lead analyst at DCIG. You may read his blogs at www.dciginc.com.

Market Place

ARN Member Login

 
Panel Sessions
  • ARN Panel Sessions: Day 3

    The last of our panel sessions recorded live at CeBIT 2008. Today, the topic is storage. Data is growing at an enormous rate, so what does the future hold?

Play
ARN news
  • Weekly Tech News Update: 8th September, 2008

    We're back again at the IFA consumer electronics show in Berlin where a virtual mirror helps you see the latest fashions, Samsung introduces a laptop that's lighter than air, and a prototype LCD TV is the thinnest on the show floor.

Play
Channel Watch
  • Brian's bloopers

    It takes a long time to produce an episode of Channel Watch. Maybe you'll understand why after watching this...

Play
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Zone

When an IT disaster occurs, how handy it would be to push a button and start again as if nothing had happened.
Discover and learn more about CA XOSoft today.
ARN Vendor Directory
ARN Library

Dataract increases e5 Workflow performance with Microsoft® Windows Server® 2008

Since upgrading to Windows Server 2008 from Windows Server 2003, Dataract have made visible improvements in their workflow calculations and image presentation performance.

Sponsored Links