Saturday | 5 July, 2008
ARN

Open source deserves a place in every IT portfolio
Siobhan McBride (Computerworld) 29 April, 2005 07:49:13

Related Stories
Additional Resources
ARN Library

Newsletter Subscription

Sign up for our ARN newsletters!
The premier provider of daily news to the IT channel, covering business, technology, products, and services.
RSS Feeds

Organizations refusing to include open source in their IT portfolio need to rethink their strategy, according to Gartner research vice president Dion Wiggins.

"I've seen too many companies have a total ban on open source, or no policy surrounding it, and a uniform 'no we're not doing open source ever' which is just foolish," Wiggins said.

So, does open source deserve a place in your IT portfolio? According to Wiggins there is a place for it somewhere.

The problem is, he said, too many organizations still carry misconceptions about open source, or make mistakes when managing it.

"There should be no such thing as on open source strategy, it shouldn't be isolated," Wiggins said.

"I see too many organizations creating a separate group to look over open source. The same thing happened with the Internet; companies were creating a separate group for the Web and e-commerce, when it really should have been integrated into the whole IT strategy."

Wiggins also took aim at the 'myths' surrounding open source: the first being that open source is against commerce. "We hear this on a regular basis, that it's software communism," Wiggins said.

"It couldn't be further from the truth; all open source ventures have a commercial aspect as well." Another myth dispelled was the apparent lack of support for the software.

"This is important to address. A couple of years ago this might have been the case, but now companies like IBM will happily take as many cheques as you want to write to support your open source project," Wiggins said.

As for the idea that open source is a passing fad because people will not work for nothing, Wiggins said most open source projects have commercial backing.

"It's not just free software for anyone who wants it," he said.

"The primary driver for open source is cost, that's the initial reason, but it shouldn't be the long-term reason," Wiggins said.

"You have to remember there will be things like audit fees and skills transfer and training, these things cost money.

"Don't push for it on cost alone, there are many more benefits."

Market Place

ARN Member Login

 
Panel Sessions
  • ARN Panel Sessions: Day 3

    The last of our panel sessions recorded live at CeBIT 2008. Today, the topic is storage. Data is growing at an enormous rate, so what does the future hold?

Play
ARN news
Play
Channel Watch
  • Brian's bloopers

    It takes a long time to produce an episode of Channel Watch. Maybe you'll understand why after watching this...

Play
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Zone

When an IT disaster occurs, how handy it would be to push a button and start again as if nothing had happened.
Discover and learn more about CA XOSoft today.
ARN Vendor Directory
ARN Library

Microsoft® takes legal action against software pirates

Recently Microsoft took legal action against individuals and resellers for distributing and selling unauthorised Microsoft software.

Sponsored Links