Please wait while the page is being loaded Skip this advertisement >
Friday | 21 November, 2008
ARN

Backup technology key to protecting virtual machines

As virtual machines proliferate, IT administrators have to be careful to choose a backup method that doesn’t bog down network performance or send licensing costs skyrocketing
Deni Connor (Network World) 05 September, 2007 10:36:54

As the number of servers being virtualized grows, backing up and protecting them becomes more of a problem. It's not enough for IT administrators to simply back up each virtual server and its data. Protection also is needed for the virtual server's image -- its operating system, configuration and settings -- and the metadata on the physical server that identifies the virtual server's relationship to networked storage.

A challenge for IT managers is choosing from among a variety of virtual server backup options, which include:

  • Traditional agent-based backup software, which installs a software agent on each virtual machine to back it up.
  • Serverless backup or consolidated backup, which offloads backup processing from virtual machines to a separate physical server.
  • Snapshotting or cloning the virtual machines using software from a vendor such as Network Appliance or software included with the virtualization package to protect data and images.
  • Writing scripts and executing them to quiesce (minimize the number of processes running on) the virtual machine, back up its contents and restore the virtual machine.
  • A combination of agent-based software and cloning.
Each virtual-machine backup approach has its advantages and disadvantages. Chief among the disadvantages is the effect on network performance and utilization.

While virtualization can result in better utilization of server resources, backing up all the newly created virtual machines concurrently for a physical server can overwhelm the network and take resources from applications running in other virtual machines.

Since by virtualizing physical machines you increase the number of servers contending for a single bus, Chris Wolf, senior analyst at Burton Group, suggests that users only virtualize physical servers that contain a PCI-Express (PCI-e) bus.

"The problem, especially in virtualization, is that when you have a shared I/O channel for all your PCI devices, the bandwidth of the bus becomes a really important issue. Traditional PCI devices can severely slow you down when you talk about six to 10 virtual machines sharing the same bus," Wolf says. "PCI-Express should be the bus of choice for all new virtualization deployments, as it offers a transfer rate up to 16Gbps in full duplex, compared to PCI Extended, which has a maximum throughput of 4Gbs."

Another factor to consider is the cost associated with agent-based backup software used in a virtual environment. Since most vendors of backup software require a separate license for each virtual machine that is being backed up, as well as one for the physical machine hosting the virtual machines, licensing costs can increase quickly.

The advantage of agent-based backup software is that IT administrators are familiar with it, having deployed it for many years to back up the physical machines in their environment.

Related Stories
  • +

    ARN's A-Z guide to networking 19 December, 2007 14:50:54

    As business needs change, so do the requirements for the business backbone. ARN looks at networking trends and technologies and reports on predictions for 2008 and beyond.
  • +

    Zenoss: New dog masters old monitoring tricks 30 November, 2007 12:50:00

    Zenoss Core 2.1 impresses with object-based approach, strong device discovery, native Windows monitoring, and open source extensibility
    Since the dawn of the business network, there has been a need to ensure that the network services provided to the enterprise are alive and responsive. Traditionally, in midsized businesses, this role has been filled by complex, closed source, and fantastically expensive solutions from manufacturers such as BMC, CA, HP, and IBM. And while these extravagant expenses make no customer happy, many users of these packages also complain of their complexity. Enough administrators have spent enough time wrangling with their monitoring systems to make a lot of smart people imagine that there must be a better way.
Additional Resources
ARN Library
Newsletter Subscription
Sign up for our ARN newsletters!
RSS Feeds
Market Place
 
Panel Sessions
  • ARN Panel Sessions: Day 3

    The last of our panel sessions recorded live at CeBIT 2008. Today, the topic is storage. Data is growing at an enormous rate, so what does the future hold?

Play
ARN news
Play
Channel Watch
Play
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery Zone

When an IT disaster occurs, how handy it would be to push a button and start again as if nothing had happened.
Discover and learn more about CA XOSoft today.
ARN Vendor Directory
ARN Library

V/Line and Oakton use Microsoft SQL Server 2008 to develop an Executive HR Dashboard

With the help of Oakton, V/Line - Victoria's regional public transport provider - utilised Microsoft SQL Server 2008 to develop an Executive HR Dashboard report.

Sponsored Links