Is profit the only driver to recycling e-waste?

Experts say no, as product stewardship plays into the equation

Recycling of e-waste has been a hot topic in the IT industry for many years, but questions have always been raised whether recycling will happen if there is no profit involved.

The problem two decades ago with paper was that companies would not buy recycled paper because it was cheaper to buy pulp from the mill, leading to warehouses being full of unused paper.

James Bradfield Moody, author of the book The Sixth Wave, admits that in many cases it is cheaper for companies to buy the raw product than do the recycling, but this mindset is no longer sustainable.

“There are mega trends in effect around resource efficiency, and scarcity will be the focus of the next 30 years,” he said.

“Ultimately, the recovery option will become more efficient than the notion that it will be cheaper to dig it out of the ground.”

That being said, Moody concedes that the profit motive is a strong one, but adds that it is not the only one.

For one, there are institutional, legal and behavioural mechanisms that can also influence behaviour.

To illustrate his point, Moody points to the overall shift to public transport, where car ownership in the US hit a peak last year and started to go down.

“The reason for that is not because cars are more expensive, but people decided that they did not want to waste their time driving a car,” he said.

“There are lots of other things they could be doing while sitting in a bus, such as tweeting.”

Issues such as whether people can afford the petrol remain, but Moody said the biggest factor for people to prefer to use public transport is the other things they could be doing instead of driving a car.

“The more profit motives you can find, the more institutional mechanisms you can get to line up the better,” he said.

“There are these other levers that can be potentially be pulled, and some of them are quite effective.”

Undertaking stewardship

Product stewardship regulator section assistant director, Michael McGee, said that the Product Stewardship Act, which came into action in August 2011, is designed to aid with this.

“Product stewardship recognises that industry should cover the costs towards recycling where it is not cost effective in itself,” he said.

McGee admits that the scheme is very expensive for the industry, but it is one approach in terms of ensuring recycling takes places where profit is not the major driver.

“If the product is valuable enough to be recycled, you may not need a product stewardship program in the same way,” he said.

Patrick Budmar covers consumer and enterprise technology breaking news for IDG Communications. Follow Patrick on Twitter at @patrick_budmar.

FILL IN THE SURVEY - AND YOU COULD BE A WINNER: ARN wants to hear from YOU. Tell us how you run a successful business and you could win an adrenaline-fuelled adventure of your choice. COMPLETE THE ARN SURVEY.

Tags eWastetechnologyrecycling

More about IDGIDG CommunicationsIDG CommunicationsIDG Communications

Comments

Comments are now closed

 

Latest News

02:36PM
Brocade deploys router for new high-speed research network platform
12:43PM
EXCLUSIVE: Tonnex International falls into liquidation after lengthy court battl...
12:38PM
Samsung's 3G Gear S could pave the way for the smartphones of the future
Aug 28
SAP backs innovation centre launch with $60m investment in Victoria (+15 photos)
More News
29 Aug
CA Expo ’14 Perth
08 Sep
ITIL Foundation (incl. Exam)
10 Sep
CPX 2014
10 Sep
IT Leaders Lunch
View all events