Is profit the only driver to recycling e-waste?

Experts say no, as product stewardship plays into the equation

Recycling of e-waste has been a hot topic in the IT industry for many years, but questions have always been raised whether recycling will happen if there is no profit involved.

The problem two decades ago with paper was that companies would not buy recycled paper because it was cheaper to buy pulp from the mill, leading to warehouses being full of unused paper.

James Bradfield Moody, author of the book The Sixth Wave, admits that in many cases it is cheaper for companies to buy the raw product than do the recycling, but this mindset is no longer sustainable.

“There are mega trends in effect around resource efficiency, and scarcity will be the focus of the next 30 years,” he said.

“Ultimately, the recovery option will become more efficient than the notion that it will be cheaper to dig it out of the ground.”

That being said, Moody concedes that the profit motive is a strong one, but adds that it is not the only one.

For one, there are institutional, legal and behavioural mechanisms that can also influence behaviour.

To illustrate his point, Moody points to the overall shift to public transport, where car ownership in the US hit a peak last year and started to go down.

“The reason for that is not because cars are more expensive, but people decided that they did not want to waste their time driving a car,” he said.

“There are lots of other things they could be doing while sitting in a bus, such as tweeting.”

Issues such as whether people can afford the petrol remain, but Moody said the biggest factor for people to prefer to use public transport is the other things they could be doing instead of driving a car.

“The more profit motives you can find, the more institutional mechanisms you can get to line up the better,” he said.

“There are these other levers that can be potentially be pulled, and some of them are quite effective.”

Undertaking stewardship

Product stewardship regulator section assistant director, Michael McGee, said that the Product Stewardship Act, which came into action in August 2011, is designed to aid with this.

“Product stewardship recognises that industry should cover the costs towards recycling where it is not cost effective in itself,” he said.

McGee admits that the scheme is very expensive for the industry, but it is one approach in terms of ensuring recycling takes places where profit is not the major driver.

“If the product is valuable enough to be recycled, you may not need a product stewardship program in the same way,” he said.

Patrick Budmar covers consumer and enterprise technology breaking news for IDG Communications. Follow Patrick on Twitter at @patrick_budmar.

Tags eWastetechnologyrecycling

More about IDGIDG CommunicationsIDG CommunicationsIDG Communications

Comments

Comments are now closed

 

Latest News

04:00PM
Over a quarter of Australians won’t bank on their mobile: Kaspersky
Oct 31
HDS A/NZ Partner Summit 2014 in Noosa (+15 photos)
Oct 31
The Google shakeup continues: Andy Rubin is out
Oct 31
Impact Systems boss wants to buy 10 resellers
More News
05 Nov
LIVE Webcast: Lessons Learned from the Biggest Security Breaches
05 Nov
vForum 2014
10 Nov
Ascom Myco Launch Event
11 Nov
DCIM Certified Solutions Professional
View all events