Windows XP and Firefox browser amass worst vulnerability record over past 25 years

Both have more than 400 recorded vulnerabilities

In a look at the number of vulnerabilities recorded over 25 years in software products and open source, a researcher at Sourcefire has determined that Microsoft Windows XP and the Mozilla Firefox browser stand out as the two with the largest number of high-severity vulnerabilities.

Windows XP has had 453 while Firefox has had 433 vulnerabilities rated high and critical based on the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database and the second source for the statistics, the National Vulnerability Database from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). High-severity vulnerabilities mean attackers can potentially fully compromise the user's machine. The total number of vulnerabilities for all the products and open-source software that has accumulated over 25 years has hit 50,000, according to Sourcefire, which is discussing the results of its research at the RSA Conference this week.

[MORE: 13 of the biggest security myths busted]

[MORE: Feds offer $20M for critical energy network cybersecurity tools]

In the 25 years of recorded vulnerabilities examined this way, there was peak of 6,612 vulnerabilities in 2006 but the worst year overall for high-severity ones was 2007 at 3,159 out of a total of 6,518, says Dr. Yves Younan, senior research engineer on Sourcefire's vulnerability research team.

There was a notable decline in annually-recorded vulnerabilities until 2010. In 2012, a total of 5,281 vulnerabilities were recorded. The good news is that for the first time ever, high-severity vulnerabilities only make up 33% of the vulnerabilities assigned CVEs; in the previous decade the average was 45%.

When it comes to smartphones, "the Apple iPhone by far has the most vulnerabilities reported for it," Younan says. The iPhone has seen 210 vulnerabilities while Google Android logs in at 24, Windows Mobile at 14 and BlackBerry at 11.

When it comes to the type of vulnerabilities in general for everything, the category of "buffer overflows" is the most predominant at 7,006 occurrences, with cross-site scripting a close second. Buffer overflows are also more likely to have a high-severity rating, with catastrophic consequences leading to wholly compromised networks after an attack. Last year, though, "access-control issues reigned supreme."

Sourcefire's report on 25 years of vulnerabilities also tackles what it acknowledges as a "controversial topic" reviewing vulnerabilities by vendor and open-source software grouping.

According to the report's analysis, the "10 worst offenders" from top down were: Microsoft; Apple; Oracle; IBM; Sun (acquired by Oracle); Cisco; Mozilla; Linux; HP; Adobe. In terms of limiting the rankings to just high-severity vulnerabilities, the list is similar, with Microsoft at the top, and Google added into the group and "Linux" dropped.

Sourcefire acknowledges that some may argue with its analysis here. The "Linux kernel" had the most CVEs reported for it at 937, but the "various iterations of Windows are considered different products, while Linux is considered a single product and Mac OS X are considered three products, which further skews the data." But Sourcefire says by combining the CVEs for all versions of Windows except the mobile ones, Windows is pinned with 1,114 vulnerabilities. Doing something similar for Linux as it did for Window by adding CVEs assigned to major vendors like Ubuntu and Red Hat, the Linux count goes to 1,752 vulnerabilities. Mac OS comes out at a total of 827.

For high-severity vulnerabilities, the product Windows XP earns the dubious position of the No.1 spot. "What's also interesting here is that of the top four browsers that have a total of 90% of the browser market share, Firefox has the most vulnerabilities in every category, followed by Chrome, then Internet Explorer and finally Safari," the report concludes.

Ellen Messmer is senior editor at Network World, an IDG publication and website, where she covers news and technology trends related to information security. Twitter: MessmerE. E-mail:

Read more about wide area network in Network World's Wide Area Network section.

Tags sourcefireNational Institute of Standards and TechnologysecurityMicrosoftsoftwareWide Area Networkmozilla

More about Adobe SystemsAppleBlackBerryCisco SecurityCisco SecurityCisco Systems AustraliaGoogleHPIBM AustraliaIDGLinuxMicrosoftMozillaOracleRed HatRSATechnologyUbuntu

ARN Directory | Distributors relevant to this article

ARN Directory | Vendors relevant to this article




This is not a very well researched article. You cant compare anything using non-relative metrics. Windows XP, being the most popular OS in history will naturally be more attacked, more analysed. Just because a vulnerability is known does not mean that the unknown vulnerabilities of other products are not there. By the way this article is written, I could make my own software and not let anyone use it but me, and it would be the most secure software on the market. Additionally XP is yesterdays technology being used in todays landscape. It is like comparing a car purchased in 2001 with a car purchased in 2008. There is 12 years of data to show the faults with a 12 year old product, only 5 years of data for the 5 year old one, which was made with security in mind!
I think I will officially state right here that the Model-T Ford was the worst car ever made, since it had no-fuel injection, no climate control and no heated seats. Plus when it rains I often get wet! And there would be thousands of people who can testify this.
I can only suggest that the author is either not good at analytics or has bias!



If fact the sourcefire researcher basically admits that they are not a very good "researcher" with this statement: "the Apple iPhone by far has the most vulnerabilities reported for it," Younan says. The iPhone has seen 210 vulnerabilities while Google Android logs in at 24, Windows Mobile at 14 and BlackBerry at 11.
Isn't it obvious that market share has an influence on security and not the product it self... so iPhone has the most vulnerabilities reported yet it is the most locked down! Very hard to believe it is less secure... the reporting of vulnerabilities has more to do with market share than it does the security of the product itself. If you just look at a one year study you would find more accurate results with Android malware everwhere!

Comments are now closed


Latest News

VIDEO INTERVIEWS: ARN Insight Luncheon Series No 2
Demand for smart devices to create channel competition: Cellnet
Definable business-based outcomes to dictate IT spend: UXC Connect
Cloud is the “real disruptor” in IT: NetApp
More News
25 Nov
GovInnovate Summit
03 Dec
DC Infrastructure Solutions Professional
04 Dec
DC Infrastructure Delivery Professional
16 Dec
DC Infrastructure Solutions Professional
View all events