Menu
Judge to consider Samsung's questions about jury foreman

Judge to consider Samsung's questions about jury foreman

Samsung has alleged that the jury foreman was untruthful and biased in a patent trial pitting the company against Apple

A court in California said Thursday that it would consider Samsung Electronics' concern that the foreman of the jury deciding a patent infringement lawsuit between Apple and Samsung had concealed information.

A jury in California decided in August that the South Korean company must pay Apple US$1.05 billion for infringing several of its patents in Samsung smartphones and tablets.

Samsung has, however, asked for a new trial of the case, alleging that the foreman of the jury, Velvin Hogan, was untruthful and biased. In the voir dire, a court procedure of questioning prospective jurors for potential bias, Hogan did not mention that he had been sued by his former employer, Seagate, for breach of contract after he failed to repay a promissory note in 1993 and filed for bankruptcy six months later, according to the filing on Oct. 2.

Samsung has a "substantial strategic relationship with Seagate," and is the single largest direct shareholder of the hard drive manufacturer after selling it a business division last year, it said in the filing.

On Oct. 30, Samsung filed a motion to compel Apple to disclose the circumstances and timing of Apple's discovery of certain information regarding the jury foreman.

Judge Lucy H. Koh of the District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose division, wrote in her order on Thursday that the court will consider the questions "of whether the jury foreperson concealed information during voir dire, whether any concealed information was material, and whether any concealment constituted misconduct."

"An assessment of such issues is intertwined with the question of whether and when Apple had a duty to disclose the circumstances and timing of its discovery of information about the foreperson," Judge Koh wrote.

The court will address Samsung's motion to compel at a Dec. 6 hearing. If the court grants the motion, it will likely order supplemental briefing before ruling on Samsung's motion for judgment as a matter of law, Koh said.

Follow Us

Join the ARN newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Appleintellectual propertySamsung Electronicslegalpatent

Upcoming

Slideshows

IN PICTURES: ARN Roundtable - Connected collaboration: the mobility story

IN PICTURES: ARN Roundtable - Connected collaboration: the mobility story

A select group of key players in the mobility space came together at Est. in Sydney to discuss the major trends, plays, problems and state of the mobility sector. A lively debate criss-crossed the mobility arena as attendees examined its potential. Photos by Editorial Director, Mike Gee

IN PICTURES: ARN Roundtable - Connected collaboration: the mobility story
IN PICTURES: Huawei Australia Roadshow 2015 - Sydney (+32 Pictures)

IN PICTURES: Huawei Australia Roadshow 2015 - Sydney (+32 Pictures)

Huawei Australia held its annual partner roadshow at Sydney's famous Randwick Racecourse. Partners, customers and analysts were all invited to hear from Huawei's experts on the state of the telecommunications industry, its work in the channel, and the future of software-defined, Cloud and 5G Networks. Photos by Allan Swann

IN PICTURES: Huawei Australia Roadshow 2015 - Sydney (+32 Pictures)

iasset.com is a channel management ecosystem that automates all major aspects of the entire sales, marketing and service process, including data tracking, integrated learning, knowledge management and product lifecycle management.

Show Comments