Windows 8: who cares? Not that many people, apparently

Users four times less likely to try Windows 8 than they did its predecessor in 2009, accortding to analytics firm

Users remain significantly less enthused about Windows 8 than they were three years ago about the then-unfinished Windows 7, according to data from an analytics firm.

The new numbers from California-based Net Applications hint at a lukewarm reception for Windows 8.

Just 0.18% of all the computers that went online during June ran one of the previews of Windows 8, statistics Net Applications showed last week. Of those PCs running Windows, 0.2% -- or 20 out of 10,000 -- were powered by Windows 8.

As in April, when Computerworld last used Net Applications' data to analyze Windows 8 uptake, the new OS' June numbers were dramatically lower than Windows 7's at the same point in its development.

In June 2009, four months before its launch, Windows 7 accounted for 0.75% of all computers and 0.80% of all Windows machines. In other words, Windows 7's share was four times that of Windows 8.

Even when the different release dates of the previews for each operating system are taken into account, Windows 8 still comes up short, although the disparity is not as pronounced. In the first full month after each sneak peek's release, Windows 7's share of all Windows PCs was two to three times greater than Windows 8's.

(Windows 7's beta reached users seven weeks earlier in 2009 than Windows 8 Consumer Preview did this year, while Windows 7's release candidate preceded Windows 8's Release Preview on the calendar by nearly four weeks.)

Four months after its Consumer Preview's debut, Windows 8's share of all Windows machines was lower than Windows 7's just seven weeks after the launch of its beta.

Other comparison also put Windows 8 in a poor light.

Windows 8's June 2012 share of 0.18%, for example, represents about 2.9 million machines of last year's estimated global installed base of 1.6 billion PCs. Windows 7's 0.75% from June 2009, meanwhile, translates into about 9.4 million systems of that year's smaller installed base of approximately 1.25 billion.

The bottom line: More than three times the number of people ran Windows 7 at the T-minus-four-month mark than ran Windows 8 at the same point in its development.

The gap between Windows 8's and Windows 7's pre-launch adoption has widened in the last four months. (Data: Net Applications.)

The operating systems have had an equal opportunity to win hearts and minds: Microsoft delivered two early versions of each to the public. They also appear to be on the same shipping schedule. Windows 7 went on sale in October 2009, and although Microsoft has not yet set a release date for Windows 8, most experts expect that it will also launch in October.

If Microsoft watches these numbers -- and there's no reason to think it does not, since the company regularly cites Net Applications' data when it discusses Internet Explorer's browser share -- it must be disheartened by the comparisons.

Not only does Windows 8 compare unfavorably to Windows 7, but the gap between the two has widened. Two months ago Windows 8's share was half of Windows 7's three years before. Since then the difference between the editions has doubled, with Windows 8's June share only one-fourth of Windows 7's in that month of 2009.

Unlike post-launch share data, the early returns are not tainted with new PCs that come with an operating system. Rather, users chose to install the previews of Windows 7 and Windows 8, and thus the share figures represent a more accurate picture of customer interest in the upcoming operating system itself, not in the desire -- or need -- to acquire new hardware.

Net Applications' data, of course, doesn't preclude Windows 8 from flourishing once new systems running it reach stores and the upgrade becomes available for purchase by those who don't plan on replacing PCs. In fact, Microsoft has priced the Windows 8 upgrade at an all-time low of $40 in a promotion that starts when the OS ships and ends Jan. 31, 2013. The price cut could jumpstart Windows 8.

But even Microsoft has tacitly admitted that Windows 8 will be a hard sell to some, notably enterprises. In mid-2009, several months before Windows 7's release, Microsoft told enterprises to dump deployment plans for that edition and shift to Windows 7.

Customers did just that: Windows 7 will become the most popular Windows this month when it passes XP in Net Applications' calculations.

However, Microsoft has not told users to stop deploying Windows 7. As recently as last month the company again urged enterprises to continue their adoption of Windows 7.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer, on Google+ or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed. His email address is gkeizer@computerworld.com.

See more by Gregg Keizer on Computerworld.com.

Read more about windows in Computerworld's Windows Topic Center.

Register now for the ARN Security Forum 2013 on June 4 at the Sydney Mint

More about: Apple, Google, Microsoft, Topic

Comments

david craker

1

As a disabled desktop PC user, Windows 8 really lets me down and makes the need for adapting to touch screens and different technologies very difficult.. Windows 7 still will have to keep me on my toes..

Tom Brown

2

David disabled people need to put more pressure on Microsoft. Windows 8 (Vista release 3) is significantly different from previous Windows and the expectation of the thinking behind the interface has to be renewed.

Greg, I think you have not analysed the case. The consumer does not see a reason to rush out for Win 8 as the press, service and sales people are not bagging Win 7.

The advent of windows 7 did several things, it gave columnists, sales and service people an excuse to dip out of Vista which they had bagged from the first, which I think mainly was Neophobia. Most had recognised the benefits of Vista and were using it when Windows 7 became available. The marketplace is fickle as people will listen to their only sources of information.

I find windows 8 is much faster and the response more even. I deplore the Metro apps provided, they are mundane, slow and annoyingly require input.

A suitable menu system and/or a rehash of Metro will resolve the issues for those who find it hard to change. Service people can do a lot to help their customers over the change.

gazmatic

3

windows 8 will eventually be the new norm after new computers will be shipped with windows 8 and windows xp etc can upgrade for just 40 bucks... my comp came with vista installed but I was too cheap to buy the expensive windows 7 so I pirated it but windows 8 at $40, I see no reason... i'm loving windows 8rp.

the ease of access has narrator, high contrast, magnifier and caret browsing. I don't know if that helps disabled people but windows 8 is much better in basically every aspect compared to windows 7

Comments are now closed.
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
ARN Directory | Distributors relevant to this article
Aquion , ASI Solutions , Australasian PC Distributors (APCD) , Avnet Technology Solutions , Bluechip Infotech , Com1 International , Compucon Computers , Dicker Data , Express Data , Express Online , ICT Distribution , Impact Systems Technology , Ingram Micro Australia , Leader Computers , Multimedia Technology , NewLease , Synnex Australia , Topstar Computer International , Wholesale IT , XiT Distribution
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to ARN's news, research and invitation only events.
ARN Distributor Directory
ARN Vendor Directory

iAsset is a channel management ecosystem that automates all major aspects of the entire sales,marketing and service process, including data tracking, integrated learning, knowledge management and product lifecycle management.

Latest Jobs