Menu
This American Life retracts show alleging Apple manufacturing misconduct

This American Life retracts show alleging Apple manufacturing misconduct

A January story on Apple and its manufacturing processes that aired on the This American Life radio program contained "significant fabrications," according to host Ira Glass.

A January story on Apple and its manufacturing processes that aired on the This American Life radio program contained "significant fabrications," according to host Ira Glass. The admission game in a Friday blog post from Glass that retracted the original piece.

The radio story, "Mr. Daisey and the Apple Factory," was created by playwright Mike Daisey--it was an excerpt of a one-man show he had been staging at theaters around the country--and purported to tell the tale of his trip to China, where he visited the Foxconn factories that make Apple's iPhones and iPads among other electronic gadgets and supposedly documented poor working conditions there.

Daisey's piece, along with a series of similar stories in the New York Times, helped create a growing storm of criticism against Apple and Foxconn. Apple CEO Tim Cook said he was outraged by the reports in an email to Apple employees but has said the company will lead the way in improving working conditions at its suppliers' factories.

The podcast version of the This American Life episode featuring Daisey's report was the most-downloaded in the show's history.

In his Friday blog post, Glass said Daisey had misled This American Life staffers during the fact-checking process. This week's episode is an hourlong examination of how the piece made it to air; audio from the original story has been removed from the show's website.

This American Life said Daisey's interpreter disputed two significant facts in the piece--that he had met underage workers, and that a man with a mangled hand was injured making iPads at Foxconn. Daisey also misreported the number of factories he visited, the number of workers he spoke with, and the locations of certain events.

"We're horrified to have let something like this onto public radio," Glass wrote.

Daisey was defiant in his own blog post Friday, but added: "What I do is not journalism."

"I stand by my work," he wrote. "My show is a theatrical piece whose goal is to create a human connection between our gorgeous devices and the brutal circumstances from which they emerge. It uses a combination of fact, memoir, and dramatic license to tell its story, and I believe it does so with integrity. Certainly, the comprehensive investigations undertaken by The New York Times and a number of labor rights groups to document conditions in electronics manufacturing would seem to bear this out."

Glass said that his show's fact-checkers had tried to contact Daisey's interpreter before the piece ran; Daisey misled them about being able to contact her.

"We're letting the audience know that too many of the details about the people he says he met are in dispute for us to stand by the story," Glass said. "I suspect that many things that Mike Daisey claims to have experienced personally did not actually happen, but listeners can judge for themselves."

Whether the retraction slows down the avalanche of criticism directed at Apple in recent months remains to be seen; parts of the New York Times series of stories have also been challenged on factual grounds.

Apple has already published its annual Supplier Responsibility report detailing its findings about conditions at supplier factories. The company has also asked the Fair Labor Association to conduct an independent investigation of the plants of its final assembly suppliers.

"Apple takes worker conditions very seriously," Apple CEO Tim Cook said last month, "and we have for a very long time."

Follow Us

Join the ARN newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Upcoming

Slideshows

In Pictures: Houston, we have a bug - 9 famous software glitches in space

In Pictures: Houston, we have a bug - 9 famous software glitches in space

There’s never a good time to run into software bugs, but some times are worse than others - like during a mission to space. Spacecraft of all shapes and sizes rely heavily on software to complete their objectives. But those missions can be quickly ended by the simplest of human errors when writing code. The omission of an overbar here or overflow error checking code there can mean the difference between success or failure, not to mention the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars, years of work and, on manned missions, human life. Use the arrows above to read about 9 examples that show that, despite the care with which these systems are built, bugs have occurred in spacecraft software since we started to fling rockets into space - and will, no doubt, continue to crop up.

In Pictures: Houston, we have a bug - 9 famous software glitches in space
IN PICTURES: Windows 10 Sydney launch

IN PICTURES: Windows 10 Sydney launch

Tech lovers and party-goers alike headed down to Mrs Macquarie's Chair to be part of the world-first Windows 10 Launch Party. The night featured a presentation by Microsoft Australia managing director, Pip Marlow, DJs, live demonstrations and digital artistry by Lister.

IN PICTURES: Windows 10 Sydney launch

iasset.com is a channel management ecosystem that automates all major aspects of the entire sales, marketing and service process, including data tracking, integrated learning, knowledge management and product lifecycle management.

Show Comments