Turnbull: New satellites unnecessary for NBN
- 08 February, 2012 16:37
- Comments 1
The National Broadband Network (NBN) does not require two new satellites to service rural customers when there is already enough broadband capacity available, according to Shadow Communications Minister, Malcolm Turnbull.
NBN Co has awarded Space Systems/Loral a $620 million contract to build two Ka-band satellites.
The broadband company will supply satellite services to three per cent of premises that fall outside of the NBN’s fibre and fixed-wireless footprint.
But Turnbull claimed there is no need to waste such a large sum of money on new satellites.
“Existing satellites available for lease and satellites that are scheduled to be launched already provide broadband services to the several hundred thousand customers in rural and remote Australia that these satellites of the NBN are going to service,” he said.
Turnbull also suggested the NBN interim satellite service could be upgraded to a permanent solution as a cheaper alternative to new satellites.
“Why buy and build vastly more capacity than you need when there is surplus capacity elsewhere?” he said.
The Shadow Communications Minister once again flogged the Coalition’s canned OPEL plan, claiming NBN-type satellite services would have been available to rural and remote Australia years ago.
The Opposition has long attacked the Federal Government’s perceived ‘reckless’ spending on the $36 billion NBN. While the Government has argued such spending is needed to accommodate for future applications that will become available on a high-speed broadband network, the Coalition has yet to be convinced.
“You can not ever future-proof,” Turnbull said, referring to claims the new Ka-band satellites are required for capacity needed in the future. “… Yes, there will be increases in demand of different types [and] how it will be satisfied.
“The technology that will do it will be more up to date closer to the event, so don’t build on the basis that they will come - build reasonably ahead of demand, but not so far that you run the risk of putting billions of dollars into infrastructure that may not even be of use.”
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Virtualization and Consolidation Solutions
- McAfee Whitepaper: Building the Business Case for Privacy
- MSP Guides for effective Endpoint Management Solutions
- Smart Cloud Provisioning: Low Cost and highly Scalable Entry Point into Cloud Computing
- New Gateway Anti-Malware Technology Sets the Bar for Web Threat Protection (Sponsored by McAfee)
- CITRIX SYNERGY ’13: Look beyond Cloud infrastructure, says Liang
- CITRIX SYNERGY ’13: Christiancen highlights the need for collaboration
- CITRIX SYNERGY ’13: Devices will change how people work, says Duursma
- Are we ready for a mobile-first world?
- Smartphone chips could replace server processors in HPC, researchers say
-
Attack on Telenor was part of large cyberespionage operation with Indian origins: report
-
Box buys iOS app to improve its own
-
Growing mobile malware threat swirls (mostly) around Android
-
Barracuda Networks raises free capacity of Copy.com to 15GB
-
Coke gives peace a chance ( +16 photos)
Get exclusive access to ARN's news, research and invitation only events. 
Comments
gnome
1
If it comes to a choice of accepting technical information from either Mike Quigley or Malcolm Turnbull, it sounds very much as though Quigley is the only one who knows what he is talking about.