China warming to broadband competition
- 28 September, 2011 08:47
- Comments 3
China is allowing more competition in building broadband infrastructure than Australia, where the federal government has created the National Broadband Network (NBN) monopoly, according to Opposition communications spokeperson, Malcolm Turnbull.
Turnbull said the lack of a cost-benefit analysis of the NBN by the federal government had increased unease about the network as Australians learnt how other nations were increasing their broadband infrastructure.
"Are we so confident in our own innate genius to believe that our approach - a massive, new government-owned fixed line broadband monopoly - is correct, and as a consequence, every other country is wrong," Turnbull said at the Broadband World Forum in Paris.
"It is very uncomfortable, as an Australian, to sit with telecoms executives and officials in China and be told that the NBN approach would not find favour in their country because 'in China we are seeking to promote competition in telecommunications infrastructure'."
The federal government has begun rolling out the $35.9 billion NBN.
It is planned to connect 93 per cent of Australian homes and businesses by fibre-optic cable (FTTH), with the rest supplied by wireless and satellite in remote areas by 2021.
Turnbull said a coalition government would restore competition within the local telecommunications sector with different technologies providing broadband services.
He said this should be undertaken by the private sector, not the government.
"Our approach will be technology agnostic," he said.
The level of government contribution to broadband projects varied between nations, but "Australia's dwarfs all of them", he said.
Government subsidies could support the rollout of a FTTH but the government's investment was an "extravagance" compared to public financing in Singapore or New Zealand, Turnbull said.
"Beyond the traditional object of ensuring people in rural and remote areas have access to telecommunications services, what are the other appropriate objects for subsidy?"
Turnbull said the rest of the world could learn from Australia's experience where "starry-eyed politicians and staggeringly expensive technology are a dangerous mix".
"The current Australian government's approach to NBN shows a blind pursuit of superfast broadband at any cost can lead you to some very anomalous policy outcomes," he said.
Nominations for the 2012 ARN IT Industry Awards open on Tuesday, June 12.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Spectra Logic and Australian National University Success Story - March 2012
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Delivers Significant TCO Advantage over Disk
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Continues to Be a Major Player
- Premier Media Group Fast Study
- Aberdeen Group: Building Business Resilience Through Active Archive
-
PRODUCTS: Aranez announces K-Leather iPad 2 case
-
Italian mathematician prepares to challenge Google
-
Facebook could buy Nokia to build 'FacePhone', expert claims
-
It's not all Doom at new media conference
-
Tech Watch: Who watches the datacentre?
Get exclusive access to ARN's news, research and invitation only events. 
Comments
John
The Liberals had enough opportunities to come up with a workable policy and plan but ended up spending taxpayers' money fighting with Telstra. Where was the competition then?
Australians want to move forward with NBN and quickly too. Please, let us not involve the courts again on this issue.
Also, do remember Australia has regions ie. small towns that are not viable to be served by private sector at the same cost as Metro. That, UNFORTUNATELY, is the beauty of a monopoly NBN. Cost benefit analysis will fail in this area.
If Malcolm has better alternatives, by all means bring it to the Govt.
grumpy
If it's going to come down to an assessment of 'innate genius' between Malcolm Turnbull and his track record, and Mike Quigley with his track record, my money would have to be on Quigley every time.
Jason
I think many rational people would have difficulty faulting Malcolm's arguments. The NBN is a fairly extravagant use of public funds. Let's be clear what is being done here -- elimination of broadband infrastructure competition and creation of another monopoly. For what purpose? Good to see a reality check.
Post new comment