ARN

yARN: Are patents all that great in IT?

"Should corporations be more careful about what they patent?"

While I was in Japan touring Toughbook facilities, one of the more interesting discussions I had with one of the Japanese execs was in regards to patents.

Panasonic doesn’t file nearly as many patents as some other IT organisations. Given how specialised and valuable the Toughbook design is to the business unit, that struck me as strange.

Yet the explanation was simple enough, and convinced me immediately, and to paraphrase, said, “If we file a patent, another organisation can read that patent, slightly improve on it, and use it in the market themselves.”

In a strange way, then, patenting technology that is difficult to reverse engineer is therefore potentially more damaging than keeping the knowledge to yourself.

Coming back to Australia and watching the war between Samsung and Apple escalate, two companies that need one another mutually, and yet find themselves at legal loggerheads, the logic makes all the more sense.

Obviously, some things do need to be patented. The Toughbook case design itself is something Panasonic has patented, because it’s easy to see how that works just from a quick look. But some of the technologies within the equipment itself is a closely guarded secret.

That raises a question: Every so often a vendor will boast about how many patents it owns, and indeed patents are the reason Google acquired Motorola, and Apple, Sony and others collaborated to outbid Google for Novell patents. Those are all public knowledge, and the nature of technology is that an R&D budget can look into a patent, and at some point, improve on it.

So the question is: Should corporations be more careful about what they patent? If Panasonic is able to be a corporation of its size and scope without being a market-leading patent filing machine, would it be preferable for others to follow that lead?

If nothing else, it might help reduce the legal bills and allow Samsung and Apple get back to competing effectively with one another, and forcing the quality of each other’s products upwards.

Nominations for the 2012 ARN IT Industry Awards open on Tuesday, June 12.

More about: Apple, ARN, Google, Motorola, Novell, Panasonic, Samsung, Sony, Toughbook

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the ARN comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: Apple, Google, Motorola, novell, Panasonic, patents, Samsing, Toughbook
ARN Directory | Distributors relevant to this article
ACA Pacific , Alloy Computer Products , Alloys , Anixter , Aquion , ASI Solutions , Australasian PC Distributors (APCD) , Avnet Technology Solutions , Bluechip Infotech , Brightpoint Australia , Compucon Computers , Dicker Data , Express Data , Express Online , ICT Distribution , Leader Computers , Multimedia Technology , Open Channel Solutions , POS POS , Synnex Australia , The IPL Group , Topstar Computer International , Transition Systems Australia , XiT Distribution , Xpress I.T. , Dynamic Supplies , Pacific Communications , Sektor , J Mills Distribution
ARN Directory | Vendors relevant to this article
Novell
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to ARN's news, research and invitation only events.
ARN Distributor Directory
ARN Vendor Directory

iAsset is a channel management ecosystem that automates all major aspects of the entire sales,marketing and service process, including data tracking, integrated learning, knowledge management and product lifecycle management.