AFACT pressures ISPs to fulfil “obligations” against content piracy
- 08 July, 2011 14:43
- Comments 2
The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) has been issuing letters to ISPs imploring them to work with the anti-piracy organisation to "fulfil their obligations".
AFACT has been in embroiled in a Federal Court case with Perth-based ISP, iiNet, since 2009. The anti-piracy group accused iiNet of authorising film piracy by not preventing such activities by its subscriber base.
Click here for a complete timeline of the iiNet v AFACT copyright court case
Despite iiNet winning round one of Court proceedings, AFACT lodged an appeal to the Full Federal Court.
The appeal was dismissed but Full Court judgement opened up possibilities of ISPs being responsible for authorising content piracy due to shortcomings in their customer service agreements.
The Australian reported AFACT had recently sent letters to ISPs which suggest that they are obliged to work with the anti-piracy organisation. The group has confirmed this with ARN.
“The recent Federal Court ruling confirmed ISPs should play a role and obligations [in preventing online copyright theft],” an AFACT spokesperson said. “This is simply an invitation to ISP to work with us.”
Some ISPs including TPG and Exetel already automatically forward notices of infringement from AFACT to relevant customers. Many others have refused to do so.
While the Internet Industry Association (IIA) is working on drawing up an Industry Copyright Code to clarify what role ISPs should play in preventing content piracy, AFACT said it was not involved in the process.
“It’d be terrific if the code respects the Federal Court findings,” the AFACT spokesperson said. “We have not worked with the IIA and the letters went directly to ISPs.”
AFACT represents over 30 high-profile movie studios
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Smart Cloud: Move Beyond monitoring to Holistic Management of Application Performance
- Modernizing Security for the Small and Mid-Sized Business – Recommendations for 2013 (Sponsored by McAfee)
- Cloud and Co-Location Solutions
- Smart Cloud Provisioning: Low Cost and highly Scalable Entry Point into Cloud Computing
- Choice and Control: Considerations for Developing Enterprise Cloud Strategies
- Amazon now selling Kindle Fire HD tablets in Australia
- CITRIX SYNERGY ’13: Partners and customers main focus in mobile strategy, says Willis
- Intel claims Haswell will offer 50 per cent more battery life in laptops
- Facebook slams brakes on HTC First's international plans following poor Home reception
- Hybrid public-private Cloud usage more widespread than you think
-
Barracuda Networks raises free capacity of Copy.com to 15GB
-
Coke gives peace a chance ( +16 photos)
-
ASI brings LapCabby to Australia
-
Telstra restructure a correct step: Paul Budde
-
Barracuda Networks raises free capacity of Copy.com to 15GB
Get exclusive access to ARN's news, research and invitation only events. 
Comments
Dan
1
“It’d be terrific if the code respects the Federal Court findings,”
Would that be the finding where the federal court dismissed the appeal against the original ruling that found ISPs aren't liable for their users activities?
Rod
2
They tried to pressure iiNet and lost, now they want to play the friendly card!
A lot of ISP were watching AFACT's behaviour against iiNet and lost a lot of goodwill in the process. Their business people should have weighed that up before they took on and lost to iiNet.
They tried to ram a flawed business model down customer's throats and wanted ISPs to be their policeman.
It was the wrong way to do things and AFACT now have few friends in the industry. Their fault, they can live it.