ARN

Coalition welcomes criticism of the NBN by senior telco executives as Labor fights back

Government fights back and issues a counter-response as analysts debates relevance of the letter

The Coalition has welcomed an open letter from several senior telco executives criticising the cost and delivery methods of the Labor Government’s National Broadband Network.

The letter said the argument for a fibre-only NBN solution had “failed to convince” and there was no demonstrated need for speeds of up to 1Gbps.

Key Liberal Party MP and former Optus executive, Paul Fletcher, said the letter was a welcome sign that the industry lacked unanimity and did not entirely back the NBN.

“It’s helpful in terms of getting good public policy outcomes,” he said. “You’ve got experienced industry players saying this is the kind of model they think is the most cost-effective and the most appropriate for Government intervention to spur the adoption of broadband.

“They see it as logical to direct Government funding to the competitive fibre optic backbone, particularly for rural and remote areas…and that it’s logical to focus spending on wireless access networks.”

When asked if he thought the industry executives were biased because they’d benefit more from a competition-based national broadband solution, Fletcher said the input of business people did not reduce their

Fletcher didn’t deny the telcos would stand to benefit more if their suggestions were implemented. But he denied this would automatically detract from their points.

“Nobody comes to this debate without having a particular perspective,” he said. “The cheerleaders for Labor’s NBN include a lot of people who expect to get significant funding…if Labor’s model goes ahead.

“It’s a reality of public policy in this area that people come to it with different perspectives,” he added. “It’s important to understand what their perspectives are, but it doesn’t bar them from offering their view and if you did bar people with a commercial interest then it’d be a disaster because you’d be relying on the views of bureaucrats.”

But telco analyst, Paul Budde, dismissed the relevance of the letter’s authors and claimed most were either small players or biased.

“These are industry players so… they think about themselves,” he said. “Obviously, they have their own agenda regarding the future of their businesses and I think that’s part of it.

“I’m not saying it’s politically driven, but if you make an announcement at this point it becomes political.”

“The only real large scale operator [on the letter] is AAPT, which we know is also in disarray,” he said. “It’s not that these are the leading lights in the industry at the moment. They’re good people, but if [AAPT CEO] Paul Broad had it all right, why is his company in such a bad shape.”

A spokesperson for Communications Minister, Senator Stephen Conroy, responded to the letter by issuing a statement promoting the benefits of the NBN and providing quotes of support from major tech companies such as Telstra, Optus, Macquarie Telecom and Intel.

“Australia has fallen further and further behind the rest of the world since the Liberals and Nationals voted to privatise Telstra,” they said. “The importance of the NBN has been widely recognised by senior executives across the Australian telecommunications sector.

Nominations for the 2012 ARN IT Industry Awards open on Tuesday, June 12.

More about: AAPT, AAPT, APT, etwork, Intel, Optus, Telstra
References show all

Comments

1

Stephen Parker

Wed 01/09/2010 - 13:51

I wouldn't exactly say the NBN will be all plain sailing either, anyone seen their business plan yet, can anyone tell us how many homes will be connected in the first year, how much will the Conroy filter slow speeds down?

2

Tom Brown

Wed 01/09/2010 - 16:21

Thanks David for the opportunity to point out some things.

Firstly as I understand it the NBN has never been a " Fibre only solution " nor 1Gb/s as you have reported said by "The Letter".
It has always had a satellite and wireless component.

So why do some perpetrate these arguments?

It is only to make an appearance of a technical argument, relying on the listener not knowing any better, it all sounds feasible until you look into the supposed "facts".

The people putting these arguments forward I believe know better, but their greedy and political motives betray their place in the shallow end of the pond.

3

Anonymous

Wed 01/09/2010 - 16:34

Hi Tom,

It's certainly something I noticed and found odd, given that the NBN is definately not a fibre-only solution. $1 billion worth of satellite services with plenty of wireless broadband has long been a part of it.

It's something I'm chasing up at the moment because these are executives that know this fact.

Best regards,

David

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the ARN comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: aapt, Coalition, Intel, macquarie telecom, National Braodband Network (NBN), optus, paul budde, paul fletcher, Senator Stephen Conroy, Telstra
ARN Directory | Distributors relevant to this article
Aquion , ASI Solutions , Compucon Computers , Express Data , ICT Distribution , Impact Systems Technology , Leader Computers , Multimedia Technology , Synnex Australia , Topstar Computer International , VExpress Distribution , Xpress I.T.
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to ARN's news, research and invitation only events.
ARN Distributor Directory
ARN Vendor Directory

iAsset is a channel management ecosystem that automates all major aspects of the entire sales,marketing and service process, including data tracking, integrated learning, knowledge management and product lifecycle management.