Menu
AFACT: iiNet regularly communicated with infringing customers

AFACT: iiNet regularly communicated with infringing customers

The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) wanted to establish iiNet had knowledge of and communicated with infringing customers on its network

The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT) wanted to establish iiNet had knowledge of and communicated with infringing customers on its network

AFACT barrister, David Catterns, has pointed to iiNet chief, Michael Malone’s testimony in the original hearing, during early comments in the copyright case’s appeal hearing in the Full Federal Court.

Malone had admitted in court the information, including IP addresses and times of alleged copyright infringements by customer accounts, given to iiNet by AFACT was “compelling evidence”.

Catterns said admitting the information was compelling evidence was tantamount to admitting iiNet had knowledge of the piracy happening on its network.

He also highlighted the regular communication iiNet had with customers. This included billing enquiries and contacting high usage subscribers with offers to bump up download limits after they had eaten their monthly download quota by illegally downloading copyright content.

In particular, Catterna referred to an iiNet customer, referenced as ‘RC0’ in Court, which AFACT alleged was a frequent illegal downloader.

“Clearly [iiNet] knew the various date, time and person [infringing copyright] but would not act on clear infringements,” Catterns said. “[iiNet] had knowledge but did nothing. It had complete power to prevent in a technological and contractual sense... short of cutting [customers] off.”

He brought up various techniques including suspending accounts, slowing down customer connection speeds after a download quota is exceeded and ‘playpenning’, that is to restrict access to certain websites once download limit is exceeded, as alternatives to terminating customer accounts.

AFACT maintains iiNet failed to enforce any measures to prevent copyright infringements on its network.

The Presiding Judge on the original case, Justice Cowdroy, recognised iiNet had knowledge and power to prevent but disregarded these facts since he concluded iiNet did not authorise the illegal download of content.

The primary technology used in committing film piracy, BitTorrent, was found to be the means of infringement and not iiNet’s network, according to Justice Cowdroy.

AFACT represents a number of high profile movie studios in the case.

Follow Us

Join the ARN newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags bittorrentAustralian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT)iiNetillegal downloadingpiracycopyright infringement

Upcoming

Slideshows

IN PICTURES: ARN Roundtable - Connected collaboration: the mobility story

IN PICTURES: ARN Roundtable - Connected collaboration: the mobility story

A select group of key players in the mobility space came together at Est. in Sydney to discuss the major trends, plays, problems and state of the mobility sector. A lively debate criss-crossed the mobility arena as attendees examined its potential. Photos by Editorial Director, Mike Gee

IN PICTURES: ARN Roundtable - Connected collaboration: the mobility story
IN PICTURES: Huawei Australia Roadshow 2015 - Sydney (+32 Pictures)

IN PICTURES: Huawei Australia Roadshow 2015 - Sydney (+32 Pictures)

Huawei Australia held its annual partner roadshow at Sydney's famous Randwick Racecourse. Partners, customers and analysts were all invited to hear from Huawei's experts on the state of the telecommunications industry, its work in the channel, and the future of software-defined, Cloud and 5G Networks. Photos by Allan Swann

IN PICTURES: Huawei Australia Roadshow 2015 - Sydney (+32 Pictures)

iasset.com is a channel management ecosystem that automates all major aspects of the entire sales, marketing and service process, including data tracking, integrated learning, knowledge management and product lifecycle management.

Show Comments