Survey: Australian's spurn voluntary Internet filter
- 26 July, 2010 12:31
- Comments 2
Consumers are willing to leave their current ISPs if providers sign onto the voluntary “child abuse” filter, according to a Compare Broadband survey.
The survey follows recent news that the Federal Government’s mandatory ISP filter has been delayed for a year and a voluntary clean-feed featuring select URLs from the ACMA’s refused classification (RC) blacklist will be used for now.
The voluntary list will be populated with websites with child abuse and child pornography material.
The ACMA blacklist covers a wider range of material including terrorist instruction guides, bestiality and overtly violent content.
The broadband comparison site, which receives a small fee from ISPs listed on the site, conducted a survey on 283 people.
Respondents were asked “If your Internet provider starts to filter content (blocking websites promoting illegal activities), would you move to one that doesn’t?” and 75 per cent said they would.
So far, only Telstra, Optus and iPrimus have signed up for the voluntary filter.
“If, as the poll suggests, 75 per cent of people start to leave their ISP due to the filter being applied it is hard to see the ISPs continuing with the voluntary trial,” Compare Broadband general manager, Scott Kennedy, said.
“The Government may well need to cooperation of all ISPs in order for this voluntary scheme to be a success, unless they choose to enact the mandatory Internet filter anyway.”
iiNet, Internode and VHA have confirmed they will be opting out of the voluntary filter.
Nominations for the 2012 ARN IT Industry Awards open on Tuesday, June 12.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Red Light In the Control Centre Saves Hours of Chaos
- Spectra Logic and Australian National University Success Story - March 2012
- Aberdeen Group: Building Business Resilience Through Active Archive
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Delivers Significant TCO Advantage over Disk
- Market Potential-Strategy Guide to the Active Archive Market
-
Italian mathematician prepares to challenge Google
-
Facebook could buy Nokia to build 'FacePhone', expert claims
-
It's not all Doom at new media conference
-
Tech Watch: Who watches the datacentre?
-
Facebook scammers host Trojan horse extensions on the Chrome Web Store













Comments
Pete
Filtering needs to be at the consumer end of the chain with ISP's acting as a pure conduit.
The individual will be liable for any criminal or unsavory activity with the ISP only required to provide evidence if requested by an appropriately authorised authority.
we are not communist China we are "free" nation where people can think and act as an individual.
The Big M
I predict most will wait and see if the filter has any effect on their usage of the Net, will perceive no difference and will stay where they are... If they perceive and experience real problems then some would move, otherwise why would they...
Post new comment