Microsoft, Google and Yahoo! speak out in ISP filter consultation

The big boys submitted their views in the Internet filter report's public consultation process

Microsoft, Google and Yahoo! have taken different tacks during public consultation over the Federal Government’s Internet filtering.

A discussion paper on Broadband Minister, Senator Stephen Conroy’s mandatory ISP filtering bill was released for public comment last December. The document offered several options for determining how refused classification (RC) content should be categorised.

On March 23, the Department of Broadband released submissions received during the discussion paper’s public consultation process.

Senator Conroy stressed only RC material, including content that promotes or incites crime, will be blocked by the proposed Internet clean-feed. One option was to allow individuals to notify the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) of potential RC content, allowing the group to assess the material, which would then be forwarded to the Australia’s Classification Review Board.

In its submission, Microsoft supported all suspected RC material being referred back to the classification board, but saw the ACMA’s involvement as cumbersome.

“As a representative body of the Australian community, the Classification Board is a body capable of independently reviewing decisions of those public servants within ACMA, who may make initial decisions about potential RC content,” Microsoft stated. “In Microsoft’s opinion, all material that is the subject of complaint and evaluation by ACMA officials should be forwarded to the Classification Board for prompt review and decision.”

The software heavyweight however, was staunchly opposed to industry groups participating in the RC content classification process.

“Microsoft believes the public in general, and not ‘industry’ representatives, are the appropriate review group for both classified material and the classification process,” the company said. “The public is responsible for supervising and reviewing the operation of this system of censorship.”

Google went beyond commenting on how RC content should be categorised and criticised the filter itself.

“Our primary concern is that the scope of content to be filtered is too wide,” the search engine giant said in its submission. “[M]oving to a mandatory ISP-level filtering regime with a scope that goes well beyond [content such as child pornography] is heavy-handed and can raise genuine questions about restrictions on access to information.”

As well as issues surrounding content itself, Google flagged potential adverse effects on its users should infrastructure be filtered. As an example, it pointed to the Enex Testlab report last year, which said high traffic sites like Google’s subsidiary, YouTube, may cause performance bottlenecks.

For Yahoo! blocking websites dealing with controversial topics, such as euthanasia and abortion, was a major flaw.

“Clearly some of [the] content is controversial and, depending on one’s political beliefs, rather offensive,” the company said in its submission. “However, we maintain there is enormous value in this content being available to encourage debate and inform opinion.”

The search engine company also panned the current classification system underpinning the Internet filter proposal.

“The existing classification regime has developed in a piecemeal and reactionary manner with little regard to or basis upon empirical evidence around public attitudes or expert studies into how consumers interact with media, and particularly digital media,” it stated.

Tags Broadband MinisterGoogleMicrosoftSenator Stephen Conroyinternet filterDepartment of BroadbandYahoo!youtube

More about Federal GovernmentGoogleMicrosoftYahoo

ARN Directory | Distributors relevant to this article

5 Comments

Borowicz

1

I sincerely hope that the Labor government has the good sense to abandon this mandatory censorship plan and / or the Libs care enough about freedom of speech and information to oppose this awful policy. The Internet is not free to air TV and should not be treated the in same way. If Conroy sincerely wanted to protect kids (that was the original excuse) , let him offer parents an op-in plan. But clearly that is not his objective. He wants full government control over what content and information adults can access, and no government can be or should be trusted with that much power. Australia is still, nominally at least, a democracy.

John Pasquale

2

We're getting this filter whether it will be effective or not no matter how many experts tear it apart its getting pushed through as the deals have already been done...

That having been said hopefully Rudd will go at the next election and this legislation will have been held up long enough to get dropped.

However the Liberals may need to cut similar deals...and with the mad monk in charge it will probably be implemented anyway.

Of course once it is in place its here to stay.

Phil

3

Well with people like Kate Lundy as the only hope? We're incredibly screwed!

http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/340542/channel_arn_podcast_senator_kate_lundy_mandatory_isp_filtering/

Think about it...

4

A company that publishes my personal data and email contacts without my permission and without notice, that disregards Australian privacy laws and contravenes US privacy laws with their BUZZ launch, wants to lecture Australia on what it can and cannot have as RC content, and how that is applied?

Google is now telling Australia what it can have classified RC? RC classification is a job for the ACB and for governments voted in by the Australian public majority in open and democratic elections. It is not and should never be stipulated by any USA corporation.

Woe the day a Google can designate Australian law, and woe the fools that welcome it for some perceived short term gain. You will live to rue the day you ever wished that.

Google is a great internet feature and driver, as is Microsoft, and both do NOTHING unless it is to their commercial advantage.

James

5

It's not just Google who OPPOSE the filter, over 90% of IT industry savvy Australians voted against the filter, over 300,000 voters!!

Google is just giving their opinion when asked. Do you think you with your non-sensicle slander can sway opinion.

The current Australian government wants to CENSOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH and turn Australia into an oppressive regime akin to China and Iran!!!

Comments are now closed

 
Computerworld
CIO
Techworld
CMO

Latest News

04:35PM
BSA settles $118,000 illegal software case
04:18PM
Cloud is moving beyond buzzword to adoption: Reckon
03:26PM
Cloud discussion now on how and not why: Bulletproof
03:17PM
Melbourne IT becomes AWS premier consulting partner
More News
03 Dec
DC Infrastructure Solutions Professional
04 Dec
DC Infrastructure Delivery Professional
16 Dec
DC Infrastructure Solutions Professional
17 Dec
DC Infrastructure Delivery Professional
View all events