Apple explains sexy app double standard
- 25 February, 2010 02:39
- Comments
Apple's ban on sexy apps -- more than 5000 apps were removed from the app store over the weekend because they contained "overtly sexual content" -- has been making headlines, mostly because of the selectivity of the removal.
While Apple removed such risqué apps as Strip Simon and Video Strip Poker, apps from big-name companies such as Sports Illustrated and Playboy remain in the App Store -- the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit App is even featured on the front page.
Apple attempted to explain its app double-standard in an interview with the New York Times. Apple's head of worldwide product marketing, Phillip Schiller, told the Times on Monday that the source and intent of apps were taken into consideration when the ban was applied. Well-established companies with "previously published material available broadly in a well-accepted format" (e.g. magazines like Playboy, FHM, and Sports Illustrated) are not held to the same rigorous constraints as unknown apps like Tight Body Perky Boobs and SlideHer Nautica.
It would appear that Apple's restriction on sexy (and subsequent lenience on well-established companies) extends to shopping apps -- the Simply Beach App, which is a bikini-shopping app that features pictures of women in bikinis (or modeling "products"), was taken down on Friday as part of the ban. The Simply Beach App was reinstated, without any official communication from Apple, today. Meanwhile the Victoria's Secret All Access App remained in the App Store all weekend, untouched.
Apple maintains that it's really doing all of this for the kids -- trying to keep the App Store a family-friendly place that won't scare off potential customers.
If Apple's doing this for the kids, it's failing -- the App Store isn't 100 percent "family friendly" as long as publications like Playboy remain in the mix (still waiting for the argument on how a soft-core porn mag is not "overtly sexual"), and all the new policy really does is give the shaft to independent developers.
Developers already have a hard time getting their apps approved for the App Store with Apple's rigorous rules and regulations, and now they have to put up with corporate schmoozing and puritanical sex bans as well? It might be time to look into developing Android apps . . .
Nominations for the 2012 ARN IT Industry Awards open on Tuesday, June 12.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Apple's Ban on Sexy Apps is Selective - PCWorld
- Apple Reportedly Bans Overtly Sexual iPhone Apps - PCWorld
- Strip Simon
- 15 Outrageous Sex Apps That Made It Into The iPhone App Store
- Apple Bans Some Apps for Sex-Tinged Content - NYTimes.com
- Tight Body Perky Boobs Photography App - PCWorld
- SlideHer Nautica Games App - PCWorld
- Simply Beach Lifestyle App - PCWorld
- Simply Beach
- Victoria's Secret All Access for iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad on the iTunes App Store
- Why Apple's Porn Purge is a Smart Move - PCWorld
- Rejected! 10 iPhone Apps That Didn't Make Apple's App Store - PCWorld
- Porn App Store Lands on Android Phones - PCWorld
- Premier Media Group Fast Study
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Continues to Be a Major Player
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Delivers Significant TCO Advantage over Disk
- Spectra Logic and Australian National University Success Story - March 2012
- Red Light In the Control Centre Saves Hours of Chaos
-
Facebook could buy Nokia to build 'FacePhone', expert claims
-
It's not all Doom at new media conference
-
Tech Watch: Who watches the datacentre?
-
Facebook scammers host Trojan horse extensions on the Chrome Web Store
-
Webroot: Growth in security














Comments
Post new comment