Q&A: Xenophon on ISPs, Telstra and the cloud
- 12 February, 2010 17:16
- Comments 7
Independent senator for South Australia, Senator Nick Xenophon, has a strong voter base and a vital cross-bench seat. He spoke with ARN about the need for negotiation with the Government over ISP filtering, Telstra’s separation and keeping cloud-based information in Australia.
In our previous Q&A, you mentioned technical problems played a major part in your opposition to a mandatory ISP filter. Have you changed your mind since the Enex Testlabs results were released?
Senator Nick Xenophon (NX): I will sit down and talk to the Government about filtering. My concern is that the money could be better spent elsewhere in terms of tracking down paedophiles. The policy objective must be to protect children. My query is whether the Government’s objective can be best achieved by this or by alternative means in terms of putting resources into policing.
I don’t have a problem with the Government offering to individual users of the Internet, Net Nanny-style filters so that individual households can make their decision. I do have a concern this will still slow things down unacceptably and you need to forensically analyse as to whether – over wide-scale use – the test results could be replicated.
Does that mean you support the Coalition’s call for an audit into the test itself?
Yes, I think that’s entirely sensible because once we do this, there’s no going back. We need to be 110 per cent sure it works.
Does that mean you don’t fundamentally oppose the idea of a mandatory filter?
No, it doesn’t mean that at all. My concern is that the money spent on a mandatory filter could be better spent in tackling those predators on the Internet in terms of paedophiles. We know that those we need to track down use file-sharing mechanisms rather than surfing the Web.
If the Government could prove to you that it could be done with very few side-effects, such as speed degradation, would you support a mandatory filter?
No. My understanding is it will cost around $40 million. Is there a better way in terms of protecting children from online predators than what the Government is proposing? That’s why the next step for me is that the Government needs to have an independent audit of those tests. I’m taking a very cautious approach.
When Senator Nick Minchin was in the communications portfolio, he was fairly vocal against Internet filtering but Tony Smith [opposition communications spokesperon] hasn’t taken the same approach. Do you think this is a change of heart?
I don’t know if there’s been a change of heart. I think Tony Smith is new to the portfolio. He clearly is a very capable front-bencher and I think the caution is a reflection of the fact that he’s only recently [been appointed] and that’s fair enough. I’m not privy to the Liberal Party, but there may be some caution there that reflects the fact that he’s just taken that role.
Come socialise with us! Facebook | LinkedIn
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Premier Media Group Fast Study
- Market Potential-Strategy Guide to the Active Archive Market
- HiveManager Online: Less Dollars, More Sense
- Aberdeen Group: Building Business Resilience Through Active Archive
- Churchtown Primary School UK Primary School Chooses Aerohive's Reliable, Manageable, Scalable and Economical Controller-less Wireless LAN Architecture
-
REVIEW: Is the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 the new king of Android tablets?
-
MySpace: The next hot social network?
-
Datacom joins AFP, Microsoft and ninemsn to support ThinkUKnow
-
Lenovo awarded NSW DET netbook contract
-
Telstra-NBN Co wholesale broadband agreement “imminent”









Comments
Johnny No Hope
There's no room for negotiation! Just say no, Nick!
Harquebus
If Nick Xenophon and the Greens do not oppose internet censorship instead of just putting up amendments, I will vote them last. Simple.
RIP Democrats.
Matthew Munro
I'm curious why he's not against the principal full stop, while all illegal content is RC, not all RC content is illegal. Why should I ever have to accept a system that will stop me viewing legal material?
Also we have spent the better part of 10 years exposing our children to filtering systems at schools and they have become very good at bypassing them. These kids can get to any sites they want, I have seen students setup their own web based proxy servers on their home computers and connect to it from school, there is no way you can stop that end of story.
The internet is like the postal service aka a carriage service, we don't hold Aust Post with the responsibility to ensure all material traversing their network is legal, so why is it expected that an ISP can or even should.
If it's illegal then report it to the police and let them deal with the people that put the content online, if it's not illegal then it is up to the parent to decide and if they want to rely on a filter that is their choice but don't force it on everyone.
Please watch this very informative video of a presentation that Mark Newton gave mid Janurary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FJt2aM_GQM
Anthony
That's right, there is no need for negotiation. The filter isn't wanted, it isn't needed and it doesn't work (if it did, then why is Conroy asking Google to censor youtube).
Just say no, Nick.
Jonathan Wilson
As someone in the IT industry who has been rejected by many employers for not having "enough experience" (and even seeing the same job advertised again a few weeks later), I do NOT support allowing more foriegn IT workers into Australia. We need to convince more employers to hire juniors like me and train them up. Not just in Sydney and Melbourne but in all the capitals.
Ailie
I'm really concerned that none of our currently elected politicians are opposed to the idea of censoring the entire nation's internet use. If this filter comes in I won't be voting out whoever brought it in at the next election, I'll simply be moving countries. I don't want to live in a communist state, and Australia is very quickly becoming one.
gnome
@Ailie, you are dead right. It's easy not to expect much sense from the major parties, so the big disappointment has been the absolute refusal by the Greens to declare they will vote against secret State censorship.
Nick deserves full public support for saying clearly that he will vote this odious measure down. If Kruddman and Conboy get their way, it will only be a matter of time before scope creep and political egos will see a lot more than RC stuff being secretly axed.
Post new comment