Brooks: Minimum fuss for users connecting to the NBN
- 20 January, 2010 12:28
- Comments 4
Consumers and businesses connecting to the forthcoming National Broadband Network (NBN) should experience minimum disruption in terms of in-house equipment, an industry expert has claimed.
Communications Alliance NBN lead consultant, Dr Paul Brooks, said providers were looking to take advantage of existing telephony sockets and Ethernet ports to deliver the next-generation network. His comment follows the release of the advisory body’s new end-user premises handbook, which aims to provide guidelines to wholesale providers and network operators on how users will connect to the NBN within their premises.
“There is a lot of uncertainty for NBN services around what it will mean in terms of changes inside the premise, and what old equipment businesses will need to swap out for new equipment,” he explained. “In the in-house/in-premise part of the network is highly variable, whereas the main network can be treated with a cookie-cutter approach – much of the process for equipment there is to select one piece of equipment, then buy 100,000s of them.
“Houses and business environments are very different from one to the other, particularly when you go from single dwellings to a block of units, of industrial estates. Businesses also have long leads times for planning technology change swapping out old equipment and financial requirements.”
Using standardised Ethernet ports or telephone sockets should make it easy and cost-effective for users to gain access to the NBN, Brooks said. However, he predicted equipment associated with ADSL broadband services could eventually become redundant.
“All the design for inside-premise services is being developed to make the new network look like the old network to existing ports and equipment,” he said. “Users won’t need to change much at all – they might be able to toss out the ADSL model and connect directly to the Ethernet plug in the wall, or a standard analogue telephone socket.
“The NBN will be much like HFC cable services in-house, where there’s just a box on the wall, and the data and telephone service parts are being dealt with through the connection outside. All the magic for services to work on the new technology will happen outside the wall, on the network itself.”
Overall, Brooks was pleased with the Communication Alliance’s progress on NBN to date. His priority for the next 6-12 months is turning theoretical and abstract discussions around NBN infrastructure and services into realities for end users. This will include an upcoming whitepaper looking at how to migrate existing Internet services from old to new networks without altering current conventions. The paper is due out in March.
Brooks also flagged harmonisation of wireless and satellite services for wholesalers, as well as assisting Government on related legislation for green estates, as key to the Communication Alliance’s agenda.
“I think the first half of this calendar year will be frantic in terms of activity on many different fronts working in parallel,” he said. “Discussions so far have been abstract and theoretical – networking costs are very important, but don’t mean much to the man on the street.
“This [end-user premises handbook] is the first input that directly relates to the network parts that concern the average Joe.”
Nominations for the 2012 ARN IT Industry Awards open on Tuesday, June 12.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
-
REVIEW: HTC Sensation - a powerful beast wrapped in a sturdy, aluminium shell
-
First look: Samsung Galaxy S III
-
Spotify tunes into Australia
-
Telstra and Navman Wireless extend GPS tracking partnership
-
World’s eyes on Aussie NBN: Conroy












Comments
Anonymous
Batteries
And where does the device power come from? What happens when there is a power outage, an emergency situation exists, and the batteries are flat (possibly through over- or under-charging or an undetected fault)? No communications possible - lives are lost. So ripping out the copper would be a serious mistake. Leave it in and use it for power distribution. Might as well have a telephone service on it too. Any government that rips out the copper without solving the reliable power availability problem playing with peoples' lives.
Anonymous
Re: batteries
Mobile phone?
If people need the ability to contact emergency services during a power outage, then they already should have a mobile phone service. It's not like the copper POTS system is 'magically-immune' to faults: in fact it has more faults than the power network!
It's an irresponsible argument from a lazy incumbent. Don't buy into it.
Anonymous
Re: Batteries
Actually Paul has discussed this in depth in the "theoretical and abstract discussions" he mentions.
All of the OTN's currently on the market have some form of backup power, usually a 9 volt battery in the unit, given that the unit is passive this gives at least several days of backup power.
The only question is over battery maintenance... i.e do we use rechargeable batteries which charge themselves while live, or standard alkaline and have them regularly swapped out? or etc. etc.
This is certainly not insurmountable, just something that needs to be nutted out between the propellerheads. The same thing is done with B2B alarm units we'll work it out.
Neil
Batteries and Safety
Having survived the fires in Canberra a few years back, and having experienced the absolute failure of both Mobile Phones and Fibre to the node during that event, I cannot recommend more strongly to retain the copper based telephone exchange system. My good old copper service was viable and fully functional through the event. Once I obtained a small generator, ADSL was back online as well... I have since removed my fibre services for both internet and telephone... they ware both unreliable and demonstrated, non functional during an emergency....
I agree, unless the safety aspects are properly addressed, lives could be lost.
Post new comment