ARN

Google and Australian ISVs unite against Government R&D changes

Search giant, ISVs, industry groups and taxation firms claim proposed changes to R&D tax concessions could spell the end for smaller local software developers

You wouldn’t normally link global search giant, Google, with Australian ISVs such as eCorner or insyston, but the issue of R&D tax concession change has united them against the Government.

Earlier this week, a “firestorm of criticism” was launched by a variety of industry groups, taxation firms and private businesses against the Government’s plan to simplify and narrow the definition of R&D.

The changes are aimed at making R&D concession a tax credit and simplifying the system.

eCorner managing director, John Debrincat, supported the Government’s stated goals but claimed the proposal altered fundamental and necessary concepts within the description of what R&D is.

“It’s going to make it very, very difficult for a software developer to make those claims and get the tax incentives,” he said. “There are many, many SMEs out there that rely on R&D funding coming back at the end of the year to get them over the quiet times and to keep that extra couple of developers on staff without having to sack them. Those guys are going to struggle like crazy.”

Debrincat, who has claimed concessions for the past four years, said the planned changes worked against the Government’s stated goal of supporting Australian R&D and innovation.

“If you consider the work these companies do is going to be innovative and will help Australia become more competitive using technology, why would you want to stop it? Why would you want to create a roadblock?” he said.

The Australian Information Industry Association (AIIA) accepts the Government’s concerns about revenue and the potential cost of dodgy claims, but has come out strongly against the plans, claiming they go too far.

“[The reforms] claim that subsidising innovation without high risk… does no more than reward a company for doing what is ‘already commercially sensible’. The logical corollary of this is that subsidising activities that display both elements, rewards companies for doing what is not commercially sensible,” it said in a statement.

“The proposed amendments…will cause critical diminution in the level and quality of R&D carried out by Australia’s SMEs and others because it will be difficult or impossible to sustain the level of financial commitment necessary to support effective R&D.”

Google is also against the changes and has thrown its corporate weight behind the AIIA. The Search engine and applications developer opened its Sydney headquarters in June 2009.

But it’s the SMBs who are in most danger, industry pundits claims. insyston managing director, Stephen MacMillan, said the current R&D tax concessions are the difference between life and death for many businesses. According to Government figures, 88 per cent of all companies conducting R&D are SMEs.

“It’s been a saviour in the last 12 months. It’s one of the major reasons why we continue to invest in the improvement of our products,” he said. “The wording they’ve used in the new proposal actually excludes people trying to automate processes and procedures that improve businesses.

“It’s going to quash the whole side of the software sector that aims for efficiency and automation.”

Despite opposing the plans, MacMillan acknowledged Government and taxpayer concerns about rewarding companies for doing low-risk research which aim to generate private profits, rather than further the knowledge and prestige of the nation.

“Your normal working individual will say ‘does that mean my tax pays these guys to do their own work?’ I can understand the concern that people on the street would have and why Government can push it through,” he said.

“I think they’ve forgotten that small businesses still employ about 80 per cent of Australian workers. So if you put a number of these against the wall, the unemployment number is going to go up.”

But even with the support and best efforts of so many companies, MacMillan was already giving up hope of the Government changing its mind.

“My belief is they’re going to push it through and the majority of the voters aren’t going to care. I’m preparing for the worst,” he said.

Nominations for the 2012 ARN IT Industry Awards open on Tuesday, June 12.

More about: AIIA, Australian Information Industry Association, Google, IIA
References show all

Comments

1

David Jordan

Thu 14/01/2010 - 12:14

Software is an export industry

The government gives tax concessions to other export industries including mining. We have a public service who is so anti the Australian software industry, when many Australian products are far superior to international software. To survive in Australia, we have to have a far more robust business model than else where in the world, but yet as an industry the government does its upmost to undermine it. Why is it committed to destroying an area that produces future income tax and future exports. When I talk to overseas colleagues about what we face in Australia, they are staggered how anti our government is towards the industry and do not know how we have survived to date.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the ARN comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: Australian Information Industry Association (AIIA), eCorner, Google, insyston
ARN Directory | Distributors relevant to this article
Aquion , Avnet Technology Solutions
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to ARN's news, research and invitation only events.
ARN Distributor Directory
ARN Vendor Directory

iAsset is a channel management ecosystem that automates all major aspects of the entire sales,marketing and service process, including data tracking, integrated learning, knowledge management and product lifecycle management.