Updated: Federal Government launches cybercrime fighting team
- 25 November, 2009 15:16
- Comments 1
The Federal Government has launched its cyber security strategy and created a new quick-response team to deal with digital threats.
According to a joint release by the Attorney-General, Robert McClelland, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Stephen Conroy, and Minister for Defence, Senator John Faulkner, the plan is the first of its kind in Australia.
“The new Australian Government Cyber Security Strategy describes the way in which the Government is tackling security threats to our computers,” McClelland said in a speech. “Defamation, fraud, copyright infringement, drug trafficking, even planning for terrorist activities…Government has to adapt its policies, laws and institutions to ensure it can prevent and, where necessary, respond to these activities.”
The Federal Opposition Liberal party spokesperson, Senator Nick Minchin, agreed with the Government's methods and supported moves to link Government departments, but criticised the lack of NBN security planning.
"Cyber crime certainly poses a serious online threat and ongoing vigilance is required," he said. "Collaborative international efforts is a sensible approach to identifying and combating known and emerging risks."
The strategy aims to formalise the responsibilities of all Government departments and create a legal framework to be used against cyber criminals. As part of the solution, the Attorney-General launched the computer emergency response team (CERT) as the nation’s main body to fight cyber crime. CERT is set to start work in January 2010 and become fully operational by July.
“[CERT] will be the national coordination point for providing cyber security information and advice to all Australians,” he said. “It will be managed by my Department and will work closely with the Cyber Security Operations Centre (CSOC)... established following the Defence White Paper released in May this year.
“It will work with other national CERTs around the world, the IT industry and Australian Internet service providers to help network operators identify and respond to cyber security incidents.”
The CSOC, which will operate under the Defence Signals Directorate, will be staffed with public servants from the Australian Federal Police and spy agency, ASIO.
The Government’s main driver to fight spam and identity theft is public education with the launch of a new booklet titled Protecting your Identity.
“It provides Australians with practical advice and strategies on how to protect personal and financial information, as well as information on our computers and what to do if we’ve been a victim of identity theft,” McClelland said.
For more information, visit the office of the Attorney General here.
Come socialise with us! Facebook | LinkedIn
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Aberdeen Group: Building Business Resilience Through Active Archive
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Continues to Be a Major Player
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Delivers Significant TCO Advantage over Disk
- Market Potential-Strategy Guide to the Active Archive Market
- Premier Media Group Fast Study
-
Tech Watch: Who watches the datacentre?
-
Facebook scammers host Trojan horse extensions on the Chrome Web Store
-
Webroot: Growth in security
-
Sice quits Acronis, joins Staples
-
Sice quits Acronis, joins Staples













Comments
John Purvey
academia
As an academic in defense and security at a post-graduate level, I have grave concerns about any counter-terrorism tactic online being used to censor online data. I mean any text can in effect 'incite' someone to commit violence against the state, and is dependent as much on interpretation as any essence in the text itself. When this cyber safety plan is merged with the latest counter terrorism legislation and the upcoming clean feed internet filter, just how much access will academics studying terrorism have to online research? The internet is rife with staunchly anti American/anti Western material, much of which is written by Western Caucasian secular academics, not violent Muslims. Should we ban Marx and Noam Chomsky? If not, why not? Neither have ruled out violence as a final means to overthrow the state. Scary times. Is national security becoming a threat to national security in Australia?
Post new comment