Internet filter trials: Smooth sailing with one ISP not started
- 26 May, 2009 12:25
- Comments 8
The majority of ISPs participating in the Federal Government’s controversial Internet filter trials report smooth sailing but one is still scrambling to get the service online.
Earlier this month, only two ISPs, Tech2U and Webshields, had successfully successfully installed and applied the Federal Government’s contentious filter onto their network. The remaining parties – Nelson Bay Online, OMNIConnect, Primus Communications, Highway 1, Netforce and Optus – were preparing for their respective launches.
A spokesperson for Communications Minister, Senator Stephen Conroy, said in a statement to ARN that the Government had worked closely with ISPs to ensure they give the “most robust results possible” for development of an ISP filtering policy.
But plagued by management issues relating to hardware, Nelson Bay Online has still yet to implement the Internet filter to its network.
“At this stage, I’m assuming our results will come out for the second round of the trials,” Nelson Bay general manager, Patrick Sayer, said.
Despite running behind schedule, Sayer claimed the Department of Broadband was indifferent towards the ISPs progress.
“They are calling periodically asking about where we are at but they don’t seem overtly concerned,” he said.
While the ISP has not tested the filter, Sayer is skeptical of its efficacy and application costs.
“It will be better than software some people install that kids can easily get around but I don’t see it as final stage of web filters,” he said. “The only filter ACMA is trying to mandate is a list that they release periodically of sites which should be blocked. I don’t think it will have a significant effect on limiting people getting to inappropriate sites but it will put a significant cost in every ISP to do so.
“The cost of doing something so small they are trying to do is going to outweigh the usefulness of what they are trying to do.”
Post-trial, Nelson Bay Online is planning to release its own filtered service at an increased price to cover the cost of filtering operations.
OMNIConnect, with a big educational institute customer-base, has engaged in the filter trials for two weeks and is claiming positive results.
“So far, none of our clients have complained,” OMNIconnect managing director, Peter Hutton, said. “We have had requests to opt-out but it was not due performance issues.”
He said 90 per cent of the ISP’s subscribers are involved in the trial and were happy to participate.
“Most customers decided to join in once they understood that it was a just a trial,” Hutton said.
The company has plans to offer the filter as a complementary service once the trial is over.
Primus Telecommunications unleashed the trial on May 11 without a hitch, releasing the service to subscribers who volunteered in Sydney and Melbourne. The company has been monitoring customer calls to assess the performance.
“So far, we have not heard of any technical issues such as latency or interruptions,” Primus product manager, Andrew Simms, said. “We also set-up the service on a few PCs in the office so our technical staff is clued in on what is going on.”
Netforce, however, was more tight-lipped regarding its progress.
The company revealed the filtering equipment had not stifled its network’s performance but it could not divulge how many customers had opted-in nor could it discuss its future plans to commercialise the service.
Optus, which set the trial in motion on May 22, was equally reticent in regards to the content filter trial.
Speaking to ARN, an Optus spokesperson declined to reveal the trial’s status and said it was too early to comment.
Several ISPs have stated their tests will conclude on June 30 with Optus set to submit results by mid-July.
The Department of Broadband expects to finish the live pilot mid-year with a report to be submitted to Minister of Broadband, Senator Stephen Conroy, following its conclusion.
Fellow participant and ISP, Highway 1, was unavailable for comment at the time of publication.
Come socialise with us! Facebook | LinkedIn
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Premier Media Group Fast Study
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Delivers Significant TCO Advantage over Disk
- Spectra Logic and Australian National University Success Story - March 2012
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Continues to Be a Major Player
- Red Light In the Control Centre Saves Hours of Chaos
-
Sice quits Acronis, joins Staples
-
Sice quits Acronis, joins Staples
-
Conroy to receive secret filter forum report
-
Sice quits Acronis, joins Staples
-
Sice quits Acronis, joins Staples














Comments
Anonymous
Doesn't matter
Even if it works perfectly with zero latency, I object to being censored by the government.
Added to that, in a time of burgeoning debt when this money could actually be routed to law enforcement, real child protection (such as increased child welfare workers etc), it's being wasted on a mirage. This will not stop child abuse, it'll merely give the illusion that it's not happening...
Anonymous
I agree fully.
Anonymous
Hmm, no numbers - as usual...
And typically, how nice that no one is saying what the numbers of subscribers (per ISP) are, so obviously I am sure there is smooth sailing if you have between 100-250 onboard, as that is easy to monitor.
This entire thing is turning into a bit of swine flu by itself, proposed by swines, obviously!
Wonder if Controly (um, Conroy) is being paid off by some major filter product companies, such as Cisco???
Anonymous
Well said.
The Womp
Real Test
It is nice that some of the ISPs realise that the system is easily circumvented, but if they want to conduct tests they should also test it's ability to do what it is intended for, so they have proof to waive in the dimwitted Conroy's face. Put a schoolboy on their system and time how long it takes him to implement a connection through a proxy server.
The schoolboy test was good enough for Howard's home filter so why not here?
Anonymous
Be Nice the Senator just paid for your network upgrade
Paid trials are like pay for comment really aren't they.
This is all a political game to appease a few out of touch lobby groups. There is no way this is anything but a push for censorship which will not get past the upper house with any black letter law to force it to happen so it's all a waste of time. To debate whether "it works" or can be done is pointless.
Pradeep Sharma
Your company profile looks very interesting and whilst browsing your website it appeared there could be some synergy between our companies. Please visit www.controlledkpis.com.au
Regards P. Sharma
Stainless Steel Juicer
This is my first time i visit here. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! keep up the good work.
Regards,
<a href="http://www.commercialjuicers.org/tomato-juicer.html">tomato juicer</a>
Post new comment