Internet content filter ISPs: Where are they now?
- 06 May, 2009 16:20
- Comments 10
ISPs participating in the Federal Government’s Internet filtering trial have reported mixed experiences in deploying technology for the scheme.
Eight ISPs have signed on to pilot the controversial internet filter: Nelson Bay Online, OMNIConnect, Primus Communications, Highway 1, Netforce, Webshield, Tech2U and Optus. iiNet was set to be involved in the trial but pulled out in March, claiming the project was “a waste of taxpayers’ money”.
In setting up its system for the trial, ISP, Nelson Bay Online, said it has had to battle network issues because of the filtering equipment.
“We wanted to implement it so it was transparent in our system in the same way it was explained to us,” general manger, Patrick Sayer, said. “It turns out our network cannot handle it very well, so we are in the process of routing specific users through.
“We expect to have it up and running in the next two weeks.”
Fellow participant OMNIConnect, managing director, Peter Hutton, said a delay in receiving the Web filter equipment has slowed the installation process.
“We only got the final equipment last week so part of the technical evaluation has just been put in,” he said. “But everything is in place and technically, everything is ready to go.”
Primus Communications products general manager, Andrew Simms, said the company has gone through the testing phase of the content filter gear to ensure network level compatibility.
“We are almost ready to go,” he said. “We are still pre-registering customers at the moment and on May 11 we will be turning all the systems on.”
After receiving approval from the Government several days ago, Highway 1 is also gearing up for a May 11 rollout.
“Assessment of our network is complete and we will commence on May 11 and finish on June 23”, Highway 1 general manager, Nick Powell, said.
Powell additionally claimed an email survey of the company’s clients showed 80 per cent were in favour of the impending content filtering trial.
Meanwhile, Netforce, while still in a customer sign-up process, has made plans to unleash the filter pilot by the end of the week.
The only two ISP’s that have already deployed the Web content filter are Webshield and Tech2U.
“We didn’t have to wait for the equipment to the same level as others since we are already a filtering company,” Webshield general manager, Anthony Pillon, said. “The only thing we had to do was to check that the ACMA blacklist was uploaded properly.”
Pillon also said the company had started a part of the trial in early March.
“We began preliminary work with the Government as soon as the trial was announced,” he said.
Tech2U general manager, Andrew Robson, who criticised what he called public misconception of the clean-feed scheme in March, said the technology has exceeded expectations.
“All is going well,” he said. “What has surprised me is that we are taking cold calls from people from other non-participating ISPs asking how to have their internet filtered.”
Robson also claimed there were no latency problems. Other observers have claimed there would be significant delays to services because of the filtering technology.
Come socialise with us! Facebook | LinkedIn
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Optus joins Federal Government's contentious Internet filter trial
- ISPs show support for Internet filter trial
- ISP: Internet filter trial has been misconstrued
- Filtered Internet to inflate access costs, slow speeds
- Content filter pilots debate critics
- ACMA's website blacklist leaking seen as a disappointing move
- Red Light In the Control Centre Saves Hours of Chaos
- Premier Media Group Fast Study
- HiveManager Online: Less Dollars, More Sense
- Aberdeen Group: Building Business Resilience Through Active Archive
- Churchtown Primary School UK Primary School Chooses Aerohive's Reliable, Manageable, Scalable and Economical Controller-less Wireless LAN Architecture
-
REVIEW: Is the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 the new king of Android tablets?
-
MySpace: The next hot social network?
-
Datacom joins AFP, Microsoft and ninemsn to support ThinkUKnow
-
Lenovo awarded NSW DET netbook contract
-
Telstra-NBN Co wholesale broadband agreement “imminent”










Comments
Steven
Policy in flux
"It will impose national content filtering for all Internet connections and will block Web pages detailed in a blacklist operated by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)."
This information is out of date - Senator Conroy is currently claiming that they'll only block "almost exclusively refused classification" and that they had never talked about using the existing ACMA blocklist (a bold-faced lie).
Anonymous
Bold faced lies all over the place...
How many times do you have to split a hair before it ceases to be a hair?
How many times do you re-interpret and mis-interpret and take a statement out of context before you are justified in calling it a bold faced lie?
Bold faced lies all over the place... yeeks! There's one again under the bed with all the commies, Chinese censorship agents and red-horned vendor reps... lol
Richary
Censorship
No matter whether the technology works or not, and I look forward to seeing some detailed figures on performance by those taking part - that is only a small part of the question.
The real question is do we want a government controlled blacklist that we aren't allowed to know what is on? It has already been shown the list includes what could be construed as political material. And if we aren't allowed to know what is being blocked then it equals censorship. You may trust our current government. Do you trust every future government?
Tim B
If the filter is so popular...
If the clean feed filter is so popular why don't they just make the whole thing optional?
Also, the fact 80% of Highway 1's customers want filtering is misleading... They service small BUSINESSES. They want it so they don't need their own inhouse filtering... It's not rocket surgery to figure that one out.
The Womp
Schoolboy "hacks" Conroy's filter ... soon
I don't see anywhere in this article where the ISPs who are so impressed with the "performance" of their new equipment actually mention the equipment's ability to perform the task it was intended for, namely controlling children. I am sure some children know what a proxy is, and would be happy to tell all their little friends.
When will these ISPs test their systems by allowing a schoolboy to try to "hack" the system? It was a good enough test for the Howard free home filter, why not here?
And, how can this website justify allowing these unscrupulous ISPs to basically advertise useless technology for sale to naive parents? Somebody should warn the parents before they have paid out good money for this sort of nonsense.
Nathan Maina
I still say yes
I say yes to ISP filtering, we don't allow porn in other public places do we? Why sould the internet be an exception.
Anonymous
yes to - what?
What is it about "will not work" that you don't understand?
This debate started by using references to pedophile content as a stalking horse for imposing secret government censorship on the Internet, despite the fact that:
a) Pedophilia is completely (and correctly) illegal right now;
b) Despite the claims of some filter vendors, vote-seeking politicians and the ACL who are orchestrating the campaign, the so-called filter will only stop a small proportion of pornography - and virtually no pedophilia because the pedophiles know how to go around it.
This debate is not about "the children". It's about power, as lobby groups seek to use references to children to impose their fundamentalist religious views on the Australian people.
Blake
Porn is not allowed in public places because it has been deemed inapropriate for public viewing due to some people not wanting to be exposed to it.
It is acceptable for an adult to to view porn in the privacy of their home in many ways including the internet.
You cant shower in a public place so does that mean we cant do it at home
wow gold
gc
We always <a href="http://www.power-leveling-game.com/">Wow Power Leveling</a> and <a href="http://www.gamcc.com">wow gold</a> or <a href="http://www.levelvip.com">wow power level</a>
wow power leveling
gc
we offer <a href="http://www.power-leveling-game.com/">Wow Power Leveling</a> and <a href="http://www.wotlkgolds.com">wow gold</a> or <a href="http://www.wotlk-power-leveling.com">wow power leveling</a>
Post new comment