After Oracle, should MySQL users stay or go?

Some say the deal will be the ruin of MySQL, while others say it could be a boost for the open-source database

How do MySQL users feel about Oracle Corp.'s takeover of the open-source database through its acquisition of Sun Microsystems Inc.? Judging by Twitter, anxious -- and snarky.

"Man, Oracle buying Sun. Please don't wreck MySQL." "Soon MySQL will be called Oracle Lite and to download you must have a support contract costing a million $ per year." "Oracle now owns MySQL?! In related news, the Rebel Alliance has been acquired by Darth Vader for three wookies and a tantan. :("

Oracle and MySQL's many competitors in the database arena were only too eager to second why those fears will come to pass. Others argue that Oracle may prove to be a positive force for MySQL.

One of MySQL's prime attractions is that nearly all of its features are available for free, even those running production databases. Less than one in 1,000 MySQL users ever pay the company a dime, former MySQL CEO Marten Mickos famously admitted.

Sun tried last year to edge toward a dual distribution model, reserving certain key features for paying customers. It quickly backed down after an outcry.

Don't expect Oracle to be as abashed as Sun.

"Companies think 'price increases' and 'usage audits' when they think of Oracle," said Ed Boyajian, CEO of database vendor EnterpriseDB Inc.

Oracle will always have to at least nominally support the free community edition of MySQL, the one that has generated more than 100 million downloads.

But given Oracle's rapacious reputation, users who have invested their time mostly in MySQL should expect to be strongly pressured to open up their wallets.

"Oracle claims in their release they can wring more profit out of existing Sun assets, but history shows this will largely come out of users' pockets," said Roger Burkhardt, CEO of open-source database provider Ingres Corp.

Microsoft Corp., whose SQL Server competes fiercely with both Oracle and MySQL, tried to be subtle while sounding the same alarm.

"Customers should ask themselves if this will add more complexity and cost to their environments at a time when the industry is asking for more clarity and value," said Neil Charney, general manager for application platform and developer tools at Microsoft.

Oracle could achieve this through several tactics done in concert. First, it could steer MySQL's development away from features such as scalable clustering, said John Newton, CTO of content management software vendor, Alfresco Software. That would be fine for Web developers, who make up the bulk of MySQL users today, but it would be bad news for would-be enterprise users, he said.

2015 ARN ICT Industry Awards: NOMINATE NOW!!!: Nominations for the 2015 ARN ICT Industry Awards are now open. Once again, it is time to NOMINATE NOW!!!

Join the ARN newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Oracle-Sun mergerSun MicrosystemsmysqlOracle

More about GartnerINGRESMicrosoftMySQLOracleRed HatSun Microsystems

ARN Directory | Distributors relevant to this article

ARN Directory | Vendors relevant to this article

Show Comments
 

Latest News

02:36PM
Dicker Data just misses breaking $1 billion mark in revenue for FY2014
12:23PM
Wi-Fi access point scans can betray a person's location
12:17PM
Liquid business environments are essential for company growth: VMware
11:45AM
CIOs still fear the Cloud: Red Hat
More News
04 Jun
Websense Data Theft Prevention Breakfast - Melbourne
04 Jun
IM Experience, Sydney
09 Jun
Ascom Nurse Call product launch
10 Jun
D-Link IP Surveillance Training and Certification
View all events