After Oracle, should MySQL users stay or go?
- 22 April, 2009 07:53
How do MySQL users feel about Oracle Corp.'s takeover of the open-source database through its acquisition of Sun Microsystems Inc.? Judging by Twitter, anxious -- and snarky.
"Man, Oracle buying Sun. Please don't wreck MySQL." "Soon MySQL will be called Oracle Lite and to download you must have a support contract costing a million $ per year." "Oracle now owns MySQL?! In related news, the Rebel Alliance has been acquired by Darth Vader for three wookies and a tantan. :("
Oracle and MySQL's many competitors in the database arena were only too eager to second why those fears will come to pass. Others argue that Oracle may prove to be a positive force for MySQL.
One of MySQL's prime attractions is that nearly all of its features are available for free, even those running production databases. Less than one in 1,000 MySQL users ever pay the company a dime, former MySQL CEO Marten Mickos famously admitted.
Don't expect Oracle to be as abashed as Sun.
"Companies think 'price increases' and 'usage audits' when they think of Oracle," said Ed Boyajian, CEO of database vendor EnterpriseDB Inc.
Oracle will always have to at least nominally support the free community edition of MySQL, the one that has generated more than 100 million downloads.
But given Oracle's rapacious reputation, users who have invested their time mostly in MySQL should expect to be strongly pressured to open up their wallets.
"Oracle claims in their release they can wring more profit out of existing Sun assets, but history shows this will largely come out of users' pockets," said Roger Burkhardt, CEO of open-source database provider Ingres Corp.
Microsoft Corp., whose SQL Server competes fiercely with both Oracle and MySQL, tried to be subtle while sounding the same alarm.
"Customers should ask themselves if this will add more complexity and cost to their environments at a time when the industry is asking for more clarity and value," said Neil Charney, general manager for application platform and developer tools at Microsoft.
Oracle could achieve this through several tactics done in concert. First, it could steer MySQL's development away from features such as scalable clustering, said John Newton, CTO of content management software vendor, Alfresco Software. That would be fine for Web developers, who make up the bulk of MySQL users today, but it would be bad news for would-be enterprise users, he said.
- The Grill: MySQL's Mårten Mickos on the Hot Seat
- MySQL reserves features for paying customers; open-source community up in arms
- Red Hat won't cut support prices because of Oracle move
- Mickos: Sun may back off -- at least a bit -- on controversial plan for MySQL add-ons
- Oracle pushes through price hikes on some products
- One winner in the Oracle-Sun deal: Microsoft?
- Which SQL is MySQL? - Computerworld Blogs
- Why Oracle Won't Kill MySQL - Forbes.com
- Simple, Proven, Tranformative
- Small business technology - This is why your business needs to be in the Cloud
- Provide clients with more powerful, cost-effective cloud hosted services
- How do you measure up against top IT service provider benchmarks?
- Vintek partners with IBM to reduce costs and improve system reliability
Gold Coast-based Icon expands into US
Optus hits 2.3Gbps throughput in real-world test
Australia lags in e-signature adoption: Adobe
Users refuse to chuck XP as Windows 8 uptake flattens
Android takes 62 per cent share of tablet market in 2013