Researcher offers tool to hide malware in .Net
- 20 April, 2009 05:03
- Comments
A computer security researcher has released an upgraded tool that can simplify the placement of difficult-to-detect malicious software in Microsoft's .Net framework on Windows computers.
The tool, called .Net-Sploit 1.0, allows for modification of .Net, a piece of software installed on most Windows machines that allows the computers to execute certain types of applications.
Microsoft makes a suite of developer tools for programmers to write applications compatible with the framework. It offers developers the advantage of writing programs in several different high-level languages that will all run on a PC.
.Net-Sploit allows a hacker to modify the .Net framework on targeted machines, inserting rootkit-style malicious software in a place untouched by security software and where few security people would think to look, said Erez Metula, the software security engineer for 2BSecure who wrote the tool.
"You'll be amazed at how easy it is to devise an attack," Metula said during a presentation at the Black Hat security conference in Amsterdam on Friday.
.Net-Sploit essentially lets an attacker replace a legitimate piece of code within .Net with a malicious one. Since some applications depend on parts of the .Net framework in order to run, it means the malware can affect the function of many applications.
For example, an application that has an authentication mechanism could be attacked if the tampered .Net framework were to intercept user names and passwords and send them to a remote server, Metula said.
.Net-Sploit automates some of the arduous coding tasks necessary to corrupt the framework, speeding up development of an attack. For example, it can help pull a relevant DLL (dynamic link library) from the framework and deploy the malicious DLL.
Metula said that an attacker would already have to have control of a machine before his tool could be used. The advantage of corrupting the .Net framework is that an attacker could clandestinely maintain control over the machine for a long time.
It could potentially be abused by rogue system administrators, who could abuse their access privileges to deploy so-called "backdoors" or malware than enables remote access, Metula said.
The Microsoft Security Response Center was notified of the issue in September 2008. The company's position is that since an attacker would already have to have control over a PC, there is not a vulnerability in .Net. It doesn't appear that Microsoft has any plans to issue a near-term fix.
At least one Microsoft official chatted with Metula after his presentation, defending the company's position. Metula said he also doesn't consider the issue a vulnerability but rather a weakness, albeit one that Microsoft could take measures to make such an attack more difficult.
"No bulletproof solution will fix it," Metula said.
Also, security vendors should upgrade their software in order to detect tampering with the .Net framework, Metula said. .Net isn't the only application framework that is vulnerable to the attack, as variations could also be applied to other application frameworks, such the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) used for running programs written in Java.
Metula has published a white paper on the technique as well as the latest version of .Net-Sploit.
Nominations for the 2012 ARN IT Industry Awards open on Tuesday, June 12.
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Red Light In the Control Centre Saves Hours of Chaos
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Delivers Significant TCO Advantage over Disk
- Premier Media Group Fast Study
- In Search of the Long-Term Archiving Solution —Tape Continues to Be a Major Player
- Market Potential-Strategy Guide to the Active Archive Market
-
REVIEW: HTC Sensation - a powerful beast wrapped in a sturdy, aluminium shell
-
First look: Samsung Galaxy S III
-
Spotify tunes into Australia
-
Telstra and Navman Wireless extend GPS tracking partnership
-
World’s eyes on Aussie NBN: Conroy













Comments
Post new comment