Microsoft loses anti-piracy patent case
- 09 April, 2009 07:03
- Comments 1
A jury in Rhode Island found Microsoft guilty of patent infringement, ordering it to pay US$38 million to Uniloc, the patent holder.
Initially filed in 2003 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, the suit alleges that Microsoft's product activation system infringes on a patent held by Uniloc.
The jury decided that the patent is valid and that Microsoft willfully infringes it.
The software giant still thinks otherwise and intends to appeal the decision.
"We believe that we do not infringe, that the patent is invalid and that this award of damages is legally and factually unsupported. We will ask the court to overturn the verdict," the company said in a statement.
Microsoft's product activation process aims to reduce piracy by requiring people to activate their software, tying it to a particular machine in the process.
Users can then reinstall the software repeatedly on that machine, but can't share the software with other people and PCs.
Uniloc sells technology that software developers use to offer flexible licensing terms, such as trial periods.
Come socialise with us! Facebook | LinkedIn
- Bookmark this page
- Share this article
- Got more on this story? Email ARN
- Follow ARN on twitter
- Churchtown Primary School UK Primary School Chooses Aerohive's Reliable, Manageable, Scalable and Economical Controller-less Wireless LAN Architecture
- Market Potential-Strategy Guide to the Active Archive Market
- HiveManager Online: Less Dollars, More Sense
- What is Wireless 2.0
- Red Light In the Control Centre Saves Hours of Chaos
-
REVIEW: Is the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 the new king of Android tablets?
-
MySpace: The next hot social network?
-
Datacom joins AFP, Microsoft and ninemsn to support ThinkUKnow
-
Lenovo awarded NSW DET netbook contract
-
Telstra-NBN Co wholesale broadband agreement “imminent”








Comments
Anonymous
Software ownership
So now Microsoft are saying it is the computer and not the person who has ownership of their software.
Have you ever changed a hard drive in an upgrade and then tried to re-install Windows? Good luck!
So what part of the computer holds the ownership? Is it the case, the processor, the hard drive, or applying reality, none of the above.
This is another Microsoft con job!
Post new comment