ARN

Spam recovers from a knockout blow

Spam volume has bounced back after the November McColo takedown cut it in half

The Internet is now officially as bad as ever, at least as far as spam goes.

Google reported Tuesday that in the second half of March, spam returned to the levels last seen just prior to the November 2008 takedown of McColo.

McColo was a hosting service based in San Jose, California, that was notorious for providing so-called "bulletproof" services to cybercriminals, who wanted to keep their servers running no matter what.

When McColo was knocked offline, it had a serious effect on the world's junk e-mail.

Spam levels dropped by half the instant the company's upstream Internet service providers - Global Crossing and Hurricane Electric - refused to service the ISP, effectively unplugging McColo from the Internet.

"Spammers have clearly rallied following the McColo takedown and overall spam volume growth during Q1 2009 was the strongest it's been since early 2008, increasing an average of 1.2 percent per day," wrote Google spokeswoman Amanda Kleha in a blog posting.

In the first quarter of last year, spam grew at 1 percent per day, which was a record at the time.

Data on another spam measurement site, Spamcop, also shows that spam has bounced back.

Spammers may be getting smarter, too, Kleha said. They seem to be building more robust botnets to send out their unwanted mail and also appear to be taking steps to avoid making their ISPs the kind of obvious target that McColo was.

"They have been building new botnets, like Conficker - which is undoubtedly designed to be difficult to take down," said Richard Cox, CIO of antispam organization Spamhaus, in an e-mail interview. He agreed with Google's conclusion that spam had now returned to pre-McColo levels.

"Spammers continue to prove their resilience," Kleha said. "They're clearly here to stay."

Come socialise with us! Facebook | LinkedIn

More about: Global Crossing, Google, Resilience, SpamCop
References show all

Comments

1

Bruckle Steinovich

Thu 02/04/2009 - 09:39

Spam

I get at least 300 SPAM messages each day, thank God for GMAIL it filters 99% out, but I still have to check the headers in case a genuine message gets caught in the spam trap.
This takes valuable production time and money.
Why is it so difficult for ISPs to cut the spammers off at the source, or is the $$$ too much to lose ?
The email part of the internet is crap, I am better of going back to snail mail

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Users posting comments agree to the ARN comments policy.
Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.
Related Coverage
Related Whitepapers
Latest Stories
Community Comments
Tags: mccolo, spam
ARN Directory | Distributors relevant to this article
Aquion , Avnet Technology Solutions , Ingram Micro Australia , COMPUTERLINKS
rhs_login_lockGet exclusive access to ARN's news, research and invitation only events.
ARN Distributor Directory
ARN Vendor Directory

iAsset is a channel management ecosystem that automates all major aspects of the entire sales,marketing and service process, including data tracking, integrated learning, knowledge management and product lifecycle management.