Intel 'energy-efficient' claim debunked

Researchers fins AMD Opteron servers can offer better power efficiency

After Intel CEO, Paul Otellini, bragged that Intel's Xeon chip was the most energy-efficient processor, Neal Nelson compared it to AMD's offering and found that Intel wasn't being exactly truthful.

Recent tests by Neal Nelson & Associates, an independent computer performance consulting firm, have reported that in 36 of the 57 cases tested an AMD Opteron-based server delivered better power efficiency than a comparably configured Intel Xeon-based server.

The tests were performed on servers configured with 2, 4, 6 and 8 gigabytes of main memory at various transaction processing load levels. The results show that for certain configurations and at certain load levels the Intel Xeon based server was 2.4 to 11.7 per cent more power efficient while in other cases the AMD Opteron based server was 9.2 to 23.1 per cent more power efficient. In addition, when the systems were idle and waiting for transactions to process, the AMD server was 30.4 to 53.1 per cent more power efficient.

Power consumption while the servers are idle is particularly significant since many servers spend most of their time waiting for work. A November 16, 2006 press release from IBM quotes a report by the Robert Frances Group which states that on average servers in data centers are idle 80 to 85 per cent of the time.

The test results also showed that:

  • Larger memory configurations deliver both higher throughput and better power efficiency
  • Intel's power efficiency advantages decrease as memory size increases,
  • AMD's power efficiency advantages increase as memory size increases,
  • For CPU-intensive workloads, the Xeon delivers 8.0 to 14.0 per cent higher peak throughput,
  • For primarily I/O intensive workloads the Opteron delivers 11.3 to 19.4 per cent higher peak throughput

Neal Nelson conducted these tests in response to a statement made by Intel 's Otellini in a July 18, 2007 analyst conference call. During that call he referred to Intel's "lead in power efficiency". Neal Nelson decided to use his company's benchmark toolset to determine if Intel actually had a lead in power efficiency.

In a somewhat dry comment, Neal Nelson said: "It appears that Mr. Otellini's statement is inconsistent with the test results."

The tests were not financed or sponsored by any company or group.

FILL IN THE SURVEY - AND YOU COULD BE A WINNER: ARN wants to hear from YOU. Tell us how you run a successful business and you could win an adrenaline-fuelled adventure of your choice. COMPLETE THE ARN SURVEY.

More about AMDHISIBM AustraliaIntelRobert Frances Group

ARN Directory | Distributors relevant to this article

Comments

Comments are now closed

 

Latest News

04:18PM
Federal Goverment prepares new laws to tackle cyberbullying on social media
03:40PM
Myriad IT puts charitable fund in the Cloud
01:40PM
Mobile Manufacturers Forum backs Telstra’s initiatives for disabled Australians
11:34AM
Telco complaints hit six-year low
More News
17 Sep
NetSuite: The ROI of Cloud Computing for VARs
17 Sep
SAP HR Connect
18 Sep
How the shift to subscription-based licensing is introducing new risks that ever...
18 Sep
National Data Centre Roadshow - Canberra
View all events